Neil “please” What are you trying to imply?
I'm a married women
I did not answer Arthur because I can not, as I don’t know,
I could tell you what my problem is though, but by posting it on here, no one would read it correctly, some would just cut and paste it in a different way, so it would look like I was on a personal mission to shut them down before they had a chance to start. That is not my intention, (that is the trouble with writing down what you mean, the other person can miss understand what you are trying to say)
Anyway here goes I DO NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH CLEAN.
I have said in other posts I wish them the best, as it is a good idea and will work of some cc’s, and if it raises public awareness then that would be the best thing since sliced bread.
I just wish that information about CLEAN would stay under wraps until they are properly ready. But some of the insiders of CLEAN are putting information on the boards, which is not making sense, but would make sense if all the information was there. Which by nature is making some people question their motives and or ask questions. A prime example of this is when you wrote on one topic who is Karen Waterworth, no doubt you look for information on me. Only natural. You asked the question I answered.
My reply number 64 was I thought a balanced comment, I thought I would join Derek on that fence.
Karen