nice result but i think "before and after" should be far more extreme than that to have the desired impact.
derek
thought my first responce was very constructive, "nice result" which it is, and i'm sure the custy was over the moon, i would of been, i then go on to give advice on how a far more extreme result would work better as a before and after.
second responce was sarcastic but you drew first blood with your "rub soil on it"
note to self, that andy foster is a bit tetchy, stear clear. post it note is now on side of comp.
i won't make that mistake again.
deepest apologies andy if i offended with the first responce, didn't mean to.
and like i said, the rest is justified.
derek