bai:go do it wfp that is,then stick a squid on before Ive just done it lost 3 customers gained 5?just explained the reason why expence of system ,resin costs and most of all new regs,but I tell them every window cleaner will eventually have to go on wfp,[o yes you will h/s/e will be around to you eventually].Ive havent seen a window cleaner in this area conplying with the new regs yet, execpt myself and the lads in the city cleaning tall buildings who was doing it before new regs came in force.DAI: MY FORMULA FOR PROFIT IS:
100 CUSTOMERS A AT WEEK1 SQUID EXTRA =100 SQUID A WEEK PAY RISE X 52 WEEKS =5200 SQUID AND YOU HAVEN EVEN BEEN FISHING= 1 PAYED FOR NEW SYSTEM
GO FOR IT DAI
GAZA
I'm still trying to figure out what the new regulations actually are. I've had a look around the HSE site and the only bits I've found about "working at height" are rather vague and seem to leave it to individual opinion as to what is safe and what isn't. Can you supply a link to anything that is more definitive please?
In answer to my own posting I did find the following to paste in:
QUOTE
SCHEDULE 6
Regulation 8(e)
REQUIREMENTS FOR LADDERS
1. Every employer shall ensure that a ladder is used for work at height only if a risk assessment under regulation 3 of the Management Regulations has demonstrated that the use of more suitable work equipment is not justified because of the low risk and -
(a) the short duration of use; or
(b) existing features on site which he cannot alter.
2. Any surface upon which a ladder rests shall be stable, firm, of sufficient strength and of suitable composition safely to support the ladder so that its rungs or steps remain horizontal, and any loading intended to be placed on it.
3. A ladder shall be so positioned as to ensure its stability during use.
4. A suspended ladder shall be attached in a secure manner and so that, with the exception of a flexible ladder, it cannot be displaced and swinging is prevented.
5. A portable ladder shall be prevented from slipping during use by -
(a) securing the stiles at or near their upper or lower ends;
(b) an effective anti-slip or other effective stability device; or
(c) any other arrangement of equivalent effectiveness.
6. A ladder used for access shall be long enough to protrude sufficiently above the place of landing to which it provides access, unless other measures have been taken to ensure a firm handhold.
7. No interlocking or extension ladder shall be used unless its sections are prevented from moving relative to each other while in use.
8. A mobile ladder shall be prevented from moving before it is stepped on.
9. Where a ladder or run of ladders rises a vertical distance of 9 metres or more above its base, there shall, where reasonably practicable, be provided at suitable intervals sufficient safe landing areas or rest platforms.
10. Every ladder shall be used in such a way that -
(a) a secure handhold and secure support are always available to the user; and
(b) the user can maintain a safe handhold when carrying a load unless, in the case of a step ladder, the maintenance of a handhold is not practicable when a load is carried, and a risk assessment under regulation 3 of the Management Regulations has demonstrated that the use of a stepladder is justified because of -
(i) the low risk; and
(ii) the short duration of use.
END QUOTE
My interpretation of the above as it affects me is that item 1 would be covered under the "short duration of use" clause (i.e. only being up the ladder for a minute of two to clean each window).
Item 5 would be covered under (c) - the "any other arrangement of equivalent effectiveness". By this I mean that sideways slipping at the top of the ladder would be prevented by the use of ladder mitts (not so effective if the sills are iced up BTW). The lower part of the ladder would be prevented from slipping by selecting an appropriate angle if the surface is dry or by placing cloth underneath the ladder in the event of a wet, mossy hard surface (cloth feels more trustworthy to me than ladder stoppers etc). On grassy surfaces, the problem is covered by the ladder sinking into the ground a bit anyway.
It wouldn't surprise me if the legislation gets tighter as time goes by. Maybe I will have to go to WFP eventually but I would prefer not to as change is scarey.