Its a shame Glyn chose to delete his membership on CIU all that was asked of him was a few simple questions and in the end he never answered them.
Most of us know about copyrights laws etc, and I for one have no intentions of breaking them, I wouldn't put reach & wash or there logo on my paperwork or vehicle, because I know its protected and this was the reasons for my questions to Glyn.
I wanted to know if I built my own DIY one would I be breaking any copyright laws? I had no intensions of copying his gutter vac, I for one know Alex isn't stupid enough to copy any-ones patent, So why warn him?
I visited Glyns web-site to see Patent pending, he was asked by another member for his patent pending registered number/s he never gave them but said he wouldn't disclose them until he was granted a patent on it, now if you have applied for a patent and its pending you can disclose it because it has already been registered.
Its a shame Glyn would not answer any ones questions directly as it would have saved a lot of replies back and forth, my main question was simple? Would I be breaking any of his copyright laws? if I built my own Gutter Vac? I asked this question 2/3 times and never once got a reply.
I had the impression that Glyn was trying to corner the market with his gutter vac and warn off any of the small fry if they tried to build there own system.
Now if you look on Glyns site all the equipment he sells, is of very good quality and no one can knock him for that, I checked all the specs on his CCTV gear and its all very good gear and worth the money he asks but you can't patent a camera on a pole, so how can you patent a gutter vac? if it has already got a patent on it, unless you make improvements to the original design.
After reading some of the replies, I came to the conclusion that Glyn may have designed some part or parts in his system and that he can patent, but he wouldn't tell us what, If he has then I hope he gets his patent.
I have the greatest respect for Glyn, as I do for every member on all the forums and my intention's and questions were honorable, if they were not then I sincerely apologies to him, they were not in any way meant to offend him, if he had answered my original post then the debate between him and myself would not have continued, I even gave Glyn the opportunity to continue the debate by email rather than an open forum.
Glyn you have my respect.