Would like to get peoples genuine oppinions on this. I have been conducting a little experiment over 6 months on 2 particular propertys which require some panes to be done trad ( as they leak with wfp ). One is done every 6 weeks & one every 4 weeks. the majority of windows are done wfp but have some panes directly next to each other which i trad. i have been taking close notice to see if the traded panes are any dirtier than the wfp'd ones & they are not. there is no difference what so ever in the level of cleanliness of each pane of glass. They are always the same, i.e. all dirty, all pretty clean or somewhere in between. Also, i wfp a different hotel every 4 weeks which is situated approx 15 meters away from the village main road, they have asked me to do a clean in between this (2 weekly) just on the front of the building as they get so dirty very quickly ( & they do ).
I know the theory behind why windows cleaned wfp should stay cleaner for longer but i have to say i think the actual effect is very, very minimal.
What i think is that for this to have any effect the conditions have to be right, but then that said, if the conditions are right then traded windows stay clean too. I trad an estate of bungalows every 4 weeks, sometimes when i return they are filthy & sometimes almost perfectly clean!
Are we guilty of being gullable, wishfull thinking, over-marketing where wfp is concerned. Have wfp'ers latched on to this & over-hyped it, exagerated it to their benefit?
I see it wrote on here all the time, comments about how cleaner for longer the windows stay when wfp'd but how much of this is actual fact & how much is over-hyped theory? I've explained how i come to this conclusion by testing the theory, has anyone done something similar which would give actual evidence either way?
I use a mixture of gg3 & squeegee off for trad, maybe this is why. maybe if i used fairy the results would be different?
Any comments welcome.
Tony