This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Dave hook

  • Posts: 94
900kg payload
« on: November 07, 2007, 06:31:15 pm »
Seen the van i want its a lwb high top ford transit connect, the guy im buying off tells me the payload is 900kg ( i'll check this out before i buy as i dont think the guy had a clue). Whats the biggest tank i could put in 1 of these vans ( safely)? Would i get away with a 650ltr?
 If any1 has any comments on these vans i'd appreciate it. Cheers.
Money makes my world go round!

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7740
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2007, 06:48:25 pm »
650 tank weighs          35kg
650 litres water           650kg
Driver and Passenger  160kg
Hose Reels                    10kg
Tank of Fuel                   60kg
Poles                             10kg
Bucket and sundries       10kg
Ladders                           20kg
Lunch                               1kg

Total = 956kg

Using these figures then no you wouldn't be able to. A 500 litre tank would be well within your limits though.

Dave hook

  • Posts: 94
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2007, 06:50:57 pm »
LUNCH = 1KG? You must cut your bread thick alex!
Money makes my world go round!

Neil_A

  • Posts: 347
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2007, 06:58:39 pm »
My van is 900kg payload... i have a 400ltr in mine,

I thyinka 650 might be a a tad to much...

But i may be wrong

Has anyone got a 650 tank in a 900kg van? 
GRADE 'A'

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7740
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2007, 07:01:44 pm »
LUNCH = 1KG? You must cut your bread thick alex!

For lunch, Alex means chocolate.

Mrs A

Alex Wingrove

  • Posts: 1435
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2007, 07:04:06 pm »
hahaha i agree all that sugar and energy you forget your tired

500l is the max someone was saying they only fill it up to the top when they are only travelling a short distance to first jobs

Paul Coleman

Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2007, 09:21:51 pm »
My own preference is to have 500kg left over above the water weight.  Mind you, I am overweight and I don't like the idea of pushing a van to its maximum all the time.  Bear in mind that payloads are limits rather than targets.   :)

NWH

  • Posts: 16952
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2007, 09:32:10 pm »
I have a new :o LWB silver connect :o and i have a 500ltr system in it,it is an upright and i have lots of room left over for other bits and peices.It copes with the weight very well when full though you know your carrying it,saying that it only takes a couple of jobs to lose some water.For a 500ltr system i would say that it is a perfect sized van i only want to change it next year because i want a van with a bigger engine as i do a lot of driving between jobs sometimes and want a bit more power.

cleantech.co.uk

  • Posts: 63
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2007, 04:26:00 pm »
I have a new :o LWB silver connect :o and i have a 500ltr system in it,it is an upright and i have lots of room left over for other bits and peices.It copes with the weight very well when full though you know your carrying it,saying that it only takes a couple of jobs to lose some water.For a 500ltr system i would say that it is a perfect sized van i only want to change it next year because i want a van with a bigger engine as i do a lot of driving between jobs sometimes and want a bit more power.

i hope thats the 230 model you have, as it has a 900 payload, other than that there is the 220 model with a 825 payload, which i think will be a bit overloaded with a 500 tank in it.
All posts by Justin @ Cleantech unless specified otherwise

DASERVICES

Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2007, 04:33:18 pm »

Driver and Passenger  160kg


I need to go on a diet  :( :(

Alex you must be as thin as a rake  ;D

NWH

  • Posts: 16952
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #10 on: November 08, 2007, 04:57:27 pm »
Mines a 220,this is why i`ve said in the past and some don`t agree that for WFP you need a medium sized van ie vivaro etc,the small vans cope ok but your right on the limit in most cases.That`s why i want to change vans because i would rather i hardly feel i`m carrying any weight.

Davew

Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #11 on: November 08, 2007, 05:09:41 pm »
There are ways of cutting the weight down on some of Alex's figures : no ladders, no roofrack, no passanger, never more than half a tank of fuel, heavy duty straps instead of a cage and of course use a superlight pole  :D

Wayne Thomas

Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2007, 07:01:30 pm »
Alex forgot to include the weight of a frame if you store your tanks in a stainless steel frame (i.e. contractor 500 from window cleaning warehouse). If unsure of your weight you're carrying fully laden go to a weighbridge (not sure how it's spelt, I appologise) as it's cheaper than getting a huge fine from the courts after the police weigh your axle loads :)

brightnclean

  • Posts: 592
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2007, 07:05:11 pm »
Yeah not only a huge fine but they will make u lighten the load on the spot before u are allowed to move back onto the road.  :(

Davew

Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #14 on: November 08, 2007, 07:13:30 pm »
Thats easy just chuck your mate out!

Wayne Thomas

Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #15 on: November 08, 2007, 07:20:04 pm »
Thats easy just chuck your mate out!

and make sure he doesn't leave his lunch box in your van (1kg) :)

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7740
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #16 on: November 08, 2007, 07:21:39 pm »

Driver and Passenger  160kg


I need to go on a diet  :( :(

Alex you must be as thin as a rake  ;D

That equates to 12.5 stone each and I am certainly lighter than that!

steve m

  • Posts: 796
Re: 900kg payload
« Reply #17 on: November 08, 2007, 07:28:14 pm »
is that 900kg payload or is that the total kerbweight deducted from the unladen weight?