It was ionics ionics ionics, but of the poles tested it was the best one. They were quite balanced about what they said and the e2+ was the best there by along way. And they did PAY for the mag. You should treat it as an advertisement which it is.
thats the point, its a advertisment mag for ionics and ionics companies, look though the mag, its all about ionics / ionics companies
the point is, people paid good money for a "magazine for window cleaners" NOT a brochure about ionics products
the dig about fishing poles not being suitable despite what "suppliers" ( gardeniers ) say, what a cheap shot and not needed
i liked the "the plan" about Jack and his round, he brought a "600 L thermo pure system" and a trafic van,
"this is not a radom choice, as this package is currently the most popular combination of system and van with a window cleaner changing from ladder to wfp" ( copyright PWCmag )
inside 3 months he is making more then he used to even with the extra outgoings of £ 545 for van and system finance, thats right, in 3 months :
:
interesting indeed, also who did they ask what was the most popular system for people changing over, ionics by any chance
the "lift off" article, which doesnt make the Vikan sound like a good brush, i guess ionics dont sell the vikan then
the first few issues of the mag were ok, yes sure they we "Leaning" towards ionics ( fair enough, they own the mag ) BUT as its gone on, it just looks like the ionics advertising team sit and write the articles themsleves
once again, a case of a certain person trying to run the WFP industry, that cannot be healthy for most