Hi everyone
I would like to commend Steve and Paul for coming forward and being slightly open on this situation (I say slightly because if they answered none FWC members questions, they would probably loose their positions on the committee). It is great to see these two guys have morals and have followed them, give yourselves a pat on the back.
What is amazing (well it isn’t really) is that none of the top notches (no disrespect to you two guys) have answered any questions on the forums or issued any form of statement on the matter. But like other people in the past, when a question is raised, the doors get closed, which does more damage than good.
I have spoken to several FWC members on phone about the issues I have raised and the web site where all the information is. My firm belief is people are not reading the site properly or reading between the lines. For some strange reason, they all believe it is about me not wanting them to buy the building. Well yes, I do not want them to buy the building, why should they?
The FWC have been in the building for in or around 40 years. They would be classed as sitting tenants, due to this; the building would have to be sold by the insurance society with them as tenant. Granted the building may have to be sold at a lower value, due to the new owners having tenants. But this happens all the time. So why do they want to purchase it?
Please all FWC members, take your time reading the information and digest it.
Many Thanks
Andrew