Guys, some of you should really keep this in perspective, there have bee the , 'Ah, but what about bird poo? Won't do it that quick if there was bird poo on it!'
Or, 'What about the back, why haven't you shown that?'
Or, 'Yeah....but...no..butyeahbut what if the frames have oxidized?'
That tiny, grainy clip only shows what can be done, it isn't a lie, and it isn't misleading.
On a repeat clean, with windows very similar to that, ie, very spare frames compared to the thick frames of a UPVC window for instance, and on glass that hasn't suffered too badly at the expense of the weather, what you see in that clip is exactly what a skilled practisioner with WFP can achieve.
I've had cleans where I have had to dip the brush in soapy water to loosen the dirt, and then go over it several times to get it right.
If you have a flow rate of only a litre per min then you won't stand a snowballs chance in hell of cleaning at that pace.
If Peter had chosen one of the ubiquitous UPVC windows, about 5 or 6 ft wide and about 4ft high with 1 thin opening light, a pane underneath, and a larger opening one to the side, it would still have only taken him another 10 or 15 seconds to do...tops!
And only then if he was to work at my pace (which is almost certainly slower than his)
so please, stop trying to claim the job is crap when you cannot see the results, and stop carping on about the fact that you can't see the results!!
Even if yo ucould see the dried, fnished results, some of you would probably say that Peter had got his ladders out and gone over it trad to make sure the results were perfect!!!
I am going to do another speed post, more to do with trad really than WFP...though I had a result that shocked me.....
Ian