The misunderstanding about battery life was disproven with data.
The misunderstanding about battery warranties was disproven with data.
So we'll ignore them, not even acknowledge the point and move on to the next item of anti-EV propaganda. Fires. And I answered that earlier in the thread. So nobody needs to look it up, I'll paste it here.
'PS. My favourite stats on fires come from an article about Tusker fleet management. (1) They have 30,000 EVs and "the company’s insurance records show that not a single one of the EVs on its fleet have caught fire." (2) "A study by the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency backs up Tusker’s findings. It concluded that EVs are 20 times less likely to catch fire than petrol and diesel cars.
Both quotes from an excellent article at
https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/tusker-fleet-data-reveals-the-truth-about-ev-fires '
What's next? "Raw material mining"? "Not recyclable" ? "Charged using fossil fuels". "Worse than keeping your old car"? Which to choose, which to choose?
Vin
PS, Luton car park fire caused by... drum roll... a diesel vehicle. BAN THEM!!!! WHO WILL THINK OF THE CHILDREN???!!
(source:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-68627759 )