This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

dazmond

  • Posts: 23966
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #20 on: March 08, 2024, 05:10:49 pm »
Whooooooosh!


Dazmond - your like my father in law  moaning about imigrants getting benefits when he's fiddled his accounts for the last 20 years so he can avoid tax  ::)roll

Don't get me on immigration....why do you think there is a massive housing crisis?my hometown is absolutely overun with them.im not racist one bit but there's too many!FAR TOO MANY!!😡😡

I don't fiddle my taxes by the way but we should have controlled immigration  not open borders.a point system similar to Australia.
price higher/work harder!

dazmond

  • Posts: 23966
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #21 on: March 08, 2024, 05:17:30 pm »
Phuck me there’s some hypocrisy in this thread. Does anyone else see it?

No one should get  benefits for doing nothing unless their severely disabled

Tend to agree, although there are people who aren’t disabled that genuinely can’t work.

We definitely have a problem with people choosing not to work because they make more in benefits.

I'm  on about  people who don't do any work whatsoever and haven't done for 20-30 years.NOT

1.people who get benefits because of very low wages
2. people who care for a loved one at home
3.genuine disabled people(mentally or physically)

Everyone else should be doing some kind of work IMO


price higher/work harder!

Bungle

  • Posts: 2389
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #22 on: March 08, 2024, 07:11:10 pm »
Vehicle tax isn’t used solely for the upkeep of roads. It goes into central government. I don’t understand why small vans are taxed so highly.

Yes, it's another attack on the self employed tying to make a living while so many others stay in bed all day.

I personally feel there's too many people of all ages in this country looking for handouts and will use any excuse not to work....this country is in a mess and we should all do our bit...

If your on benefits and not looking for work you should be forced to litter pick around the local area and other community work that needs doing.


Yeah, and make them wear pyjamas with arrows printed on them 💪
We look at them, they look through them.

Smudger

  • Posts: 13438
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #23 on: March 09, 2024, 12:23:02 am »
do you think a single man earning 65K a year should get a cheap rental flat ?
Never argue with an idiot, they will only bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience

Bungle

  • Posts: 2389
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #24 on: March 09, 2024, 01:00:49 am »
do you think a single man earning 65K a year should get a cheap rental flat ?

Do you think a scrounger who never lifts a finger should have all their bills paid by the tax payers?
We look at them, they look through them.

Smudger

  • Posts: 13438
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #25 on: March 09, 2024, 01:23:06 am »
unfortunately it happens and usually by the indigenous population.
Never argue with an idiot, they will only bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience

dazmond

  • Posts: 23966
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #26 on: March 09, 2024, 09:11:50 am »
do you think a single man earning 65K a year should get a cheap rental flat ?

Absolutely not.
price higher/work harder!

Don Kee

  • Posts: 4878
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #27 on: March 09, 2024, 11:17:56 am »
Give over Daz.

You might think that just because you shine a few windows that you can climb your high horse but that subsidised flat puts you in the same bracket as the rest of the scroungers you describe mate.

Immigrant induced housing crisis?
I give you a guy that boasts about 5 star holidays and baked bean baths taking up a social housing flat that he quite clearly doesn’t need.

I sort of respect the whole positive attitude you have and the way you’ve turned your life around but get a grip tiger, you’re part of the problem.
Why don't you have a quick google before making stupid comments?

simon w

  • Posts: 1647
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #28 on: March 09, 2024, 12:58:30 pm »
Give over Daz.

You might think that just because you shine a few windows that you can climb your high horse but that subsidised flat puts you in the same bracket as the rest of the scroungers you describe mate.

Immigrant induced housing crisis?
I give you a guy that boasts about 5 star holidays and baked bean baths taking up a social housing flat that he quite clearly doesn’t need.

I sort of respect the whole positive attitude you have and the way you’ve turned your life around but get a grip tiger, you’re part of the problem.

He'll be giving up that flat to a single mum or deserving low earner soon when he movesin with his Mrs. A move that he won't be able to back track as his life situation will be very different now then when he originally qualified for social housing or help from the tax payers  :) probably be hard giving up that security knowing once gone it'll be gone for good.

AuRavelling79

  • Posts: 25379
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #29 on: March 09, 2024, 01:16:52 pm »
There is a difference.

When you 'qualify' for a council flat there is no rule that says you have to get out if your circumstances later change.

Otherwise the little old widow granny that lives in a 3 bed semi since her kids left and husband died would have to leave.

When you qualify for cash benefits it's because you 'cannot' work and when you can then you should.

(I actually think there is a case for forced eviction of single or couple subsidised renters in 3 bed houses being moved into smaller dwellings. In fact the high rise flats that are well kept with working lifts, parking and security would be ideal. It's the scrotes that make them unpleasant.)
It's a game of three halves!

simon w

  • Posts: 1647
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #30 on: March 09, 2024, 01:29:04 pm »
Phuck me there’s some hypocrisy in this thread. Does anyone else see it?

No one should get  benefits for doing nothing unless their severely disabled

Tend to agree, although there are people who aren’t disabled that genuinely can’t work.

We definitely have a problem with people choosing not to work because they make more in benefits.

I'm  on about  people who don't do any work whatsoever and haven't done for 20-30 years.NOT

1.people who get benefits because of very low wages
2. people who care for a loved one at home
3.genuine disabled people(mentally or physically)

Everyone else should be doing some kind of work IMO

I bet all the immigrants residents in daz's block of flats must think  Rockefeller living alongside them  ;D

deeege

  • Posts: 5008
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #31 on: March 09, 2024, 01:31:45 pm »
There is a difference.

When you 'qualify' for a council flat there is no rule that says you have to get out if your circumstances later change.

Otherwise the little old widow granny that lives in a 3 bed semi since her kids left and husband died would have to leave.

When you qualify for cash benefits it's because you 'cannot' work and when you can then you should.

(I actually think there is a case for forced eviction of single or couple subsidised renters in 3 bed houses being moved into smaller dwellings. In fact the high rise flats that are well kept with working lifts, parking and security would be ideal. It's the scrotes that make them unpleasant.)

Wasn’t there a big kick off a few years ago when they introduced a ‘bedroom tax’? Meaning the people living in 3 bed council properties would have to pay more or downsize.

Benefits, including social housing should all be means tested and I believe most are. Which begs the question again, should a single person on £50k per year with a years income in savings, be living in subsidised social housing?
"....and it's lend me ten pounds, I'll buy you a drink, and mother wake me early in the morning."

simon w

  • Posts: 1647
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #32 on: March 09, 2024, 01:41:15 pm »
There is a difference.

When you 'qualify' for a council flat there is no rule that says you have to get out if your circumstances later change.

Otherwise the little old widow granny that lives in a 3 bed semi since her kids left and husband died would have to leave.

When you qualify for cash benefits it's because you 'cannot' work and when you can then you should.

(I actually think there is a case for forced eviction of single or couple subsidised renters in 3 bed houses being moved into smaller dwellings. In fact the high rise flats that are well kept with working lifts, parking and security would be ideal. It's the scrotes that make them unpleasant.)

Wasn’t there a big kick off a few years ago when they introduced a ‘bedroom tax’? Meaning the people living in 3 bed council properties would have to pay more or downsize.

Benefits, including social housing should all be means tested and I believe most are. Which begs the question again, should a single person on £50k per year with a years income in savings, be living in subsidised social housing?

Council should put his rent up to 1.8k a month, he'd soon move in with "the Mrs" then  ;D simultaneously freeing up a dwelling more suited to somebody in a similar situation as when he originally qualified to get it.   

dazmond

  • Posts: 23966
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #33 on: March 09, 2024, 02:44:16 pm »
Give over Daz.

You might think that just because you shine a few windows that you can climb your high horse but that subsidised flat puts you in the same bracket as the rest of the scroungers you describe mate.

Immigrant induced housing crisis?
I give you a guy that boasts about 5 star holidays and baked bean baths taking up a social housing flat that he quite clearly doesn’t need.

I sort of respect the whole positive attitude you have and the way you’ve turned your life around but get a grip tiger, you’re part of the problem.

Half the flats round here are boarded up now and it's not uncommon for people to get stabbed or shot and crack and heroin is a real problem.....

Most people would be scared to death living here!😆

You simply can't put me in the same bracket as a machete wielding drug dealer who's been on benefits for 20 years!🤣



price higher/work harder!

dazmond

  • Posts: 23966
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #34 on: March 09, 2024, 02:49:52 pm »
Give over Daz.

You might think that just because you shine a few windows that you can climb your high horse but that subsidised flat puts you in the same bracket as the rest of the scroungers you describe mate.

Immigrant induced housing crisis?
I give you a guy that boasts about 5 star holidays and baked bean baths taking up a social housing flat that he quite clearly doesn’t need.

I sort of respect the whole positive attitude you have and the way you’ve turned your life around but get a grip tiger, you’re part of the problem.

He'll be giving up that flat to a single mum or deserving low earner soon when he movesin with his Mrs. A move that he won't be able to back track as his life situation will be very different now then when he originally qualified for social housing or help from the tax payers  :) probably be hard giving up that security knowing once gone it'll be gone for good.

Any single mums who have moved in over the years move out within a few months because of the violence and xl bully type dogs....
price higher/work harder!

simon w

  • Posts: 1647
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #35 on: March 09, 2024, 03:48:58 pm »
Give over Daz.

You might think that just because you shine a few windows that you can climb your high horse but that subsidised flat puts you in the same bracket as the rest of the scroungers you describe mate.

Immigrant induced housing crisis?
I give you a guy that boasts about 5 star holidays and baked bean baths taking up a social housing flat that he quite clearly doesn’t need.

I sort of respect the whole positive attitude you have and the way you’ve turned your life around but get a grip tiger, you’re part of the problem.

He'll be giving up that flat to a single mum or deserving low earner soon when he movesin with his Mrs. A move that he won't be able to back track as his life situation will be very different now then when he originally qualified for social housing or help from the tax payers  :) probably be hard giving up that security knowing once gone it'll be gone for good.

Any single mums who have moved in over the years move out within a few months because of the violence  my relentless drumming and xl bully type dogs.... prancing around in my gym shorts...

Small but perfectley formed

  • Posts: 1744
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #36 on: March 09, 2024, 04:04:40 pm »
Council house tenancies are not a benefit neither are they means tested.
Anyone can go on the waiting list lots of my customers have sold houses and got council bungalows.
Spit and polish

Splash & dash

  • Posts: 4364
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #37 on: March 09, 2024, 04:48:07 pm »
Council house tenancies are not a benefit neither are they means tested.
Anyone can go on the waiting list lots of my customers have sold houses and got council bungalows.


You can’t just apply to go on the council housing list , you have to meet certain criteria and even then it is a very long list and you could be waiting years to get anything .

dazmond

  • Posts: 23966
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #38 on: March 09, 2024, 04:54:22 pm »
There is a difference.

When you 'qualify' for a council flat there is no rule that says you have to get out if your circumstances later change.

Otherwise the little old widow granny that lives in a 3 bed semi since her kids left and husband died would have to leave.

When you qualify for cash benefits it's because you 'cannot' work and when you can then you should.

(I actually think there is a case for forced eviction of single or couple subsidised renters in 3 bed houses being moved into smaller dwellings. In fact the high rise flats that are well kept with working lifts, parking and security would be ideal. It's the scrotes that make them unpleasant.)

Wasn’t there a big kick off a few years ago when they introduced a ‘bedroom tax’? Meaning the people living in 3 bed council properties would have to pay more or downsize.

Benefits, including social housing should all be means tested and I believe most are. Which begs the question again, should a single person on £50k per year with a years income in savings, be living in subsidised social housing?

Council should put his rent up to 1.8k a month, he'd soon move in with "the Mrs" then  ;D simultaneously freeing up a dwelling more suited to somebody in a similar situation as when he originally qualified to get it.

It has actually gone up to just over £91 a week from next month....

I'll be moving out soon as my stepdaughter has just had an offer excepted on her first house today!😛😜
price higher/work harder!

dazmond

  • Posts: 23966
Re: Road fund licence....
« Reply #39 on: March 09, 2024, 04:55:42 pm »
Council house tenancies are not a benefit neither are they means tested.
Anyone can go on the waiting list lots of my customers have sold houses and got council bungalows.


You can’t just apply to go on the council housing list , you have to meet certain criteria and even then it is a very long list and you could be waiting years to get anything .

I was on the list for around 8 years before I got a property....👍
price higher/work harder!