But you are not talking about microscopic particles- even in terms of visibility to the human eye. You are claiming a superior finish in terms of enhanced "shine". How does that come about?
I don’t know I cannot explaine it , I have several friends some of whome are Di only and some are ro and Di the Di only guys arnt doing a bad job but they cannot get the same results that we get ,that’s not boasting it’s just a fact , we did just one house in a road to start with then gradually we ended up doing 15 as the people could see a big difference between what there cleaner was doing compared to us , the glass was dull no shine on it the white frames are also dull , this is especially the case on a sunny day when the sun shines on the glass evan the other cleaners openly admit they cannot get theses results , I think if you are used to using Di only you don’t realise the difference that can be achieved with ro , and before ones get up in arms Ime not slagging off ones who use Di , it’s the same as a car you drive a golf and think it’s fast as you haven’t driven anything else , then drive a Ferrari and all of a sudden you realise the go,f isn’t as fast as you thought it was , same applies to Di-ro , again Ime not belittling Di guys , when I started years ago Mark Robbins from winteck said tome if you want the rolls Royce for cleaning windows get ro ,Di is ok but ro will give better results . Ionic systems is also another company I spoke to before I got my systems again they said exactly the same thing , most firms will say Di is ok but ro is a better system.