This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Smudger

  • Posts: 13438
Split thread re: Employed and Self employed status.
« on: November 03, 2018, 09:03:05 pm »
Just a reminder chaps - there are changes in the self employed status the self employed now need to show they work for several companies or they will be classsec as paye and you will still have to pay the ni etc

Darran
Never argue with an idiot, they will only bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience

John Mart

Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2018, 09:21:47 pm »
Just a reminder chaps - there are changes in the self employed status the self employed now need to show they work for several companies or they will be classsec as paye and you will still have to pay the ni etc

Darran
Have you got a link to this Darran. I’d not heard about this.

Crystal-clear

  • Posts: 3029
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2018, 10:30:00 pm »
only my humble research at present im still learning would love it cleared up but
this is from hmrc

www.gov.uk/working-for-yourself
You’re probably self-employed if you:
run your business for yourself and take responsibility for its success or failure
have several customers at the same time
can decide how, where and when you do your work
can hire other people at your own expense to help you or to do the work for you
provide the main items of equipment to do your work

are responsible for finishing any unsatisfactory work in your own time
charge an agreed fixed price for your work
sell goods or services to make a profit

i Bolded what seems to also fit into the cat.perhaps some people prefer or will accept to work as self employed for various benefits ie not needing to turn up to work if they dont want too

apparently we have over 500,000 people working as self employed but mainly working for one establishment im sure hmrc would prefer it the other way around yet perhaps the very people who offer the work if hmrc really put there foot down. then they may not ever employ employ and we could have half a million people out of work and on well maybe on the dole which is worse for the economy.

seems these arrangements get messy when they want to claim employment rights. Then it gets controversial.

Kev Martin

  • Posts: 6954
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2018, 10:30:17 pm »
Yes the Revenue are going to come down hard on the Self Employed.  You will be OK if you are genuine but those that work for only a couple of companies or individuals will need to prove that this it not their mainstay in their wages or the revenue are going to insist on National Insurance
"Natural Stone Restoration Specialists" Tel: 0121 773 9129
www.tilinglogistics.co.uk | www.marblelife.co.uk  http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Tiling-Logistics

Crystal-clear

  • Posts: 3029
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2018, 11:05:16 pm »
I think the changes would be IR35 i think its more directed at the p takers ie big companys not the windy with a couple of mates kicking about in a spare mondeo ;D still our big boys have between 10-20 vans are serious from our standpoint but considered extremely small in retrospect A business with 100 or fewer employees is generally considered small.

Phillip Hammond
“After listening carefully to representations made during the consultation, we will delay these changes until April 2020, and we will only apply them to large and medium size businesses.”

100-999 employees is considered to be medium-sized.

Read more at: https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/budget/ir-35-changes-self-employed-workers-budget-2018/


Smudger

  • Posts: 13438
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2018, 11:11:04 pm »
Announced in the budget - take your chances if you want 👍

Darran
Never argue with an idiot, they will only bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience

John Mart

Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2018, 06:26:17 am »
Announced in the budget - take your chances if you want 👍

Darran
Well I don’t. I employ properly and would love to see the “self employed” status outlawed. It’s immoral and allows those immoral “employers” to undercut.

John Mart

Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2018, 06:30:49 am »
I think the changes would be IR35 i think its more directed at the p takers ie big companys not the windy with a couple of mates kicking about in a spare mondeo ;D still our big boys have between 10-20 vans are serious from our standpoint but considered extremely small in retrospect A business with 100 or fewer employees is generally considered small.

Phillip Hammond
“After listening carefully to representations made during the consultation, we will delay these changes until April 2020, and we will only apply them to large and medium size businesses.”

100-999 employees is considered to be medium-sized.

Read more at: https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/budget/ir-35-changes-self-employed-workers-budget-2018/
Unfortunately you’re right.

Crystal-clear

  • Posts: 3029
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2018, 09:15:54 am »
Well its a subject I've always been interested in
As I've had this fantasy of expanding to the point of employing but the pitfalls and administrative side of PAYE don't really benefit a very small business and micro business like most of us have
It's not the National Insurance contributions it's more the legal side of employment law that would give us a lot of caution before we approach. And stuff like sick pay that could decimate a micro-business imagine if someone goes sick for the entire year.

I don't employ myself rather than a subby who occasionally works out of his own van to help me catch up when im late. Personally if I was employing I would prefer to go down the PAYE route it does seem much more clear cut.

It is what it is if people are doing it and it's done correctly the working relationship is set out correctly drafted out on paper signed he accepts to work on those terms and you have taken measures to ensure that he is at least self-employed perhaps the people who do it know what they're doing. I think the equaliser would be that the big boys are telling them they can work and go home whenever they like but obviously if the work isn't completed then they no longer have a job?
The first part of that is very much self employment
Also a commission paid job again you need to complete jobs to be paid rather than just turn up

Using common sense I'm certain HMRC would prefer this individual to be employed, but at the same time they would prefer him to be self-employed rather than unemployed there is a reason why this law is rather vague and why a lot of companies still employ in this manner just imagine the amount of unemployed if this law was extremely strict to micro businesses too.

It's a funny one people who do it I'm sure they do it legally so all the big boys out there fair play. Another reason why someone would accept it in our industry is they would prefer to work for a percentage and make for example 3000 pounds in a month rather than minimum wage.
The big boys don't tend to talk about it too much and it's fair enough although Im sure a lot of us wouldn't mind clarification nothing better than hearing it from the horses mouth. Experience and knowledge beats everything.

As I say I think there will be a humongous unemployment level if this was a serious rather than vague outline. Looking at the history it's been challenged a few times some of these cases are mainly high profile like uber. Think about how many friends you may know about that working like that even restaurants that get paid weekly forget about us at the moment at least if you did employ someone like this you could tell him to turn up whenever he wanted and go home whenever he wanted but at a restaurant it's blatantly employment.

Ir35 that effects probably less than 1% of any window cleaning company in the United Kingdom and they are still delaying it until 2020 because they know the impact even on that large-scale.

Anyway if we cant hear from the big boys lets hear from the smart boys like spurce what do you think about all this   ;)

Kev Martin

  • Posts: 6954
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2018, 09:32:11 am »
I think the changes would be IR35 i think its more directed at the p takers ie big companys not the windy with a couple of mates kicking about in a spare mondeo ;D still our big boys have between 10-20 vans are serious from our standpoint but considered extremely small in retrospect A business with 100 or fewer employees is generally considered small.

Phillip Hammond
“After listening carefully to representations made during the consultation, we will delay these changes until April 2020, and we will only apply them to large and medium size businesses.”

100-999 employees is considered to be medium-sized.

Read more at: https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/budget/ir-35-changes-self-employed-workers-budget-2018/

No it’s not!  Don’t be fooled by what Hammond says.  If you are running a window, carpet or just general cleaning company and you have people working for you then. “It’s simple”. If they work for you they work for you Period!   You cannot have them working for you and then state they are self employed.  If the Revenue prove it is your work that you source and provide, then they Work for you end of.  They will not only do you for the lost NI both employee and employer rates they will back track as far back as seven years for lost payments.

About 10 years ago I did a contract which was fairly sizeable for a well known department store.  It lasted just over 8 months.  The Revenue went after them stating that they were employing my company even though all my guys were on my books and PAYE they still weren’t happy.  They only backed off because I proved we were actually working for other people as well during that period and each job we did for that store were individual contracts although they ran into each other.  There is a big loophole in getting people to work for you and either stating you are using them as casual or that they  are self employed by them obtaining a UTR and then registering for CIS.  The Revenue dip out on over 14.8 % NI and they don’t like it
"Natural Stone Restoration Specialists" Tel: 0121 773 9129
www.tilinglogistics.co.uk | www.marblelife.co.uk  http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Tiling-Logistics

Small but perfectley formed

  • Posts: 1744
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2018, 09:44:49 am »
Looks like construction and courier business also taxis  will get hammered by HMRC ?
Spit and polish

Crystal-clear

  • Posts: 3029
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2018, 10:46:07 am »
Looks like construction and courier business also taxis  will get hammered by HMRC ?

I think time will tell. Realistically and I'm using common sense here imagine if they hammer the construction trade. Ok not a problem sorry everyone is unemployed now no more work let's pack up.
Imagine the amount of unemployed imagine the hit on the economy.
There's over half a million bogus if you want to call it self-employed working in the uk. That doesn't include actual self-employed People Like Us.

They deliberately have outlined medium to large companies with employees over 100 or 1000 that ir35 is going to hit whether or not the smaller businesses will also be hit that will be interesting time will tell

I wonder what everyone else thinks on the subject that the economy would collapse if they hammer all these taxi drivers and construction people as the companies they work for will probably fold.

The bottom line is not everyone can find PAYE employment. I know if you can't employ properly don't employ it all I possibly agree with that.but at the same time that very person who has the potential to have an income and to pay taxes to the revenue along with  not needing to sign on will not have the job in the first place.

Imagine those people losing their homes and of course as far as the revenues concerned them not generating any money in taxes it's a sensitive subject. And quite complicated looking from the outset it's humongous in the construction trade the very people that did my friends bathroom are all self-employed working for someone else they were using his van his tools and been paid a day rate..

tlwcs

  • Posts: 2088
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2018, 10:57:07 am »
The girl from purple bricks who came to us Friday was self employed but only worked for purple bricks
Another fiddle  ;)

Crystal-clear

  • Posts: 3029
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2018, 11:25:36 am »
The girl from purple bricks who came to us Friday was self employed but only worked for purple bricks
Another fiddle  ;)
This is the Thing purplebricks a serious company.
They wouldn't be naive to do it by taking a risk.
Ir35 will definitely affect these sort of companies and they will need to restructure which is fair enough when you have over 100 employees making you probably half a million pounds worth of Profit a year you can afford 25 grand on a HR person

Walter Mitty

  • Posts: 1314
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #14 on: November 04, 2018, 12:39:32 pm »
MODERATOR:?  Wouldn't it be fairer to have the posts on this subject in a separate thread, because some might associate this practice with Lee Pryor.  I realise that thread drift often occurs but in this case it might be misunderstood and cause him problems.

Lee Pryor

  • Posts: 2287
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #15 on: November 04, 2018, 12:51:00 pm »
Its a good point Walter

To be honest im not bothered, ive got a folder full of payslips and a very expensive contract done by an employment lawyer. What people think they do or dont know about my business doesnt worry me and they should really focus on themselves a bit more. On top of that we have had 2 visits in the last 5 years from hmrc and the vat man and no problems.





The best way to predict the future is to create it.

Walter Mitty

  • Posts: 1314
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #16 on: November 04, 2018, 01:01:15 pm »
Its a good point Walter

To be honest im not bothered, ive got a folder full of payslips and a very expensive contract done by an employment lawyer. What people think they do or dont know about my business doesnt worry me and they should really focus on themselves a bit more. On top of that we have had 2 visits in the last 5 years from hmrc and the vat man and no problems.

Good stuff.  Yes, I prefer to focus on my own stuff too.  Life is more peaceful that way.

david mark

  • Posts: 468
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #17 on: November 04, 2018, 01:18:37 pm »
Take their contracts away and give them new ones.

I have one here you can look at if you like, all done properly.

£8 per hour basic, then up to £4 per hour in bonuses paid at the director's discretion.

Crystal-clear

  • Posts: 3029
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #18 on: November 04, 2018, 02:45:35 pm »
No this definitely isn't about Lee Pryor I mean he's the most helpful big boy window cleaner on the forum which is basically benefiting us all and motivating us this is just basically about the new laws ir35 and how plenty  tradesmen employ on self employment and it seems to actually be ok. Anyway straight from the horses mouth Lee everyone's employed which is obviously the best way to go

you're obviously very educated in this subject so what do you think about it all and ir35 and a vagueness of self-employment when it comes to working for somebody who is also running a company or a small business
It would be awesome to hear from somebody with experience whether it's Lee himself or anyone else

employment with the contract is obviously the better way to go
Maybe there's another big boy reading this who wants to say he's been employing for 20 years in this Manor with no problems I'm sure they exist would be great to hear from them

Lee Pryor

  • Posts: 2287
Re: Lee Pryer
« Reply #19 on: November 04, 2018, 03:10:09 pm »
The accoutancy firm I use is quite big and they have  HR services within the package I pay them for, so just like the accounting side ( I am not an accountant or an HR manager) I pass it all to them and they do it for me, except for contracts which I paid another firm for, around £2000
The best way to predict the future is to create it.