I've been out all day so here's the deal.
I'm being pretty clearly accused repeatedly of tax evasion. I'm not. The deal is a franchise. It's not "rent". All the guys are uniformed, in sign written vans, etc, etc. They pay for the right to use our name. They run their own business. There are hundreds upon hundreds of franchises across the world running in the same way.
Ref our accounts; if you don't understand how limited companies finances work, e.g. that money owed to me and my wife as individuals appears as debt on the company accounts, don't make silly comments.
Regarding leaving and trying to carry on, the franchise agreement is clear that if someone leaves they (the ex-franchisee) are not entitled to carry out cleaning at any current customer. Note that the customer can ask whomever they want to clean their windows (to insist otherwise would be nonsensical). However, the ex-franchisee would be unable to do so; that's what the court case and damage claim would be about. As I know that this will be wilfully misunderstood by at least one person on this thread, I'll repeat, no-one is forcing the customer not to use the ex-franchisee; instead the ex-franchisee is obliged to turn the work down or pay damages to the franchisor for breach of contract (with the franchisor, not the customer).
Common sense and the law are often far apart - that's why I use a franchise solicitor for advice rather than an internet forum. So, all that I've said above is true (at least according to a ridiculously expensive legal expert) but I have no doubt some of you will be able to tell me where she's wrong.
Vin