This is an advertisementInterested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
blah, blah, blah...To clarify, I don't care about your business and wish you all the success in the world, it matters not to me - however, I will confirm again, I do think you're a jumped up, narcissistic, big headed K N O B regardless of those things.
Quote from: Granville Gold on February 13, 2016, 01:01:42 pm@VinJust skimmed through the posts following your reply to me and come back to mention - if you check my point about a van I said "new (ish)" but it did cross a line ending.I take your points about e.g. accountant referrals and skimming off of setting up charges.May I ask - if a franchisee has a customer walk up to him, does he have free rein to negotiate the price and does he keep 100% at least as long as he is a franchisee?All our pricing is menu-based and, in general, we stick to it unless a house is well off the norm. However, that decision is entirely up to the franchisee.Regardless of how a customer comes in, royalties are due. If that seems harsh, the logic is that the only reason someone even sees the guy out working is because they are a franchisee in the first place. If it wasn't for the franchise the work wouldn't have come in.Vin
@VinJust skimmed through the posts following your reply to me and come back to mention - if you check my point about a van I said "new (ish)" but it did cross a line ending.I take your points about e.g. accountant referrals and skimming off of setting up charges.May I ask - if a franchisee has a customer walk up to him, does he have free rein to negotiate the price and does he keep 100% at least as long as he is a franchisee?
Quote from: ♦ChumBucket♦ on February 13, 2016, 01:21:13 pmblah, blah, blah...To clarify, I don't care about your business and wish you all the success in the world, it matters not to me - however, I will confirm again, I do think you're a jumped up, narcissistic, big headed K N O B regardless of those things. Good for you. Jolly good. Well done. Your opinion is important to me.Vin
Quote from: Perfect Windows on February 13, 2016, 01:48:41 pmQuote from: ♦ChumBucket♦ on February 13, 2016, 01:21:13 pmblah, blah, blah...To clarify, I don't care about your business and wish you all the success in the world, it matters not to me - however, I will confirm again, I do think you're a jumped up, narcissistic, big headed K N O B regardless of those things. Good for you. Jolly good. Well done. Your opinion is important to me.VinSo you keep saying but you still reply to my observations.
Quote from: ♦ChumBucket♦ on February 13, 2016, 03:02:43 pmQuote from: Perfect Windows on February 13, 2016, 01:48:41 pmQuote from: ♦ChumBucket♦ on February 13, 2016, 01:21:13 pmblah, blah, blah...To clarify, I don't care about your business and wish you all the success in the world, it matters not to me - however, I will confirm again, I do think you're a jumped up, narcissistic, big headed K N O B regardless of those things. Good for you. Jolly good. Well done. Your opinion is important to me.VinSo you keep saying but you still reply to my observations. I haven't replied to any of your observations (observations? Personal insults, actually) except with my standard reply. Unless you mean the reply I made to "micky barber". I did respond to that. Perhaps that's the observation of yours to which you're referring.Vin
Hi TomI know of one that has lost one and another lost two.Any management situation wether it be franchising, renting, employment etc can result in people falling out through misunderstandings & resentment.The clause that covers this is "non-competing" which means the operator regardless of relationship (see above) is restricted geographically for a set period to operate in the same manner as before, however in order for this to stand any chance of success it would need to be deemed as "fair" ie "not within 6 miles for 1 year" rather than "not with UK ever".I believe it is easier to enforce this through employment contracts rather than the other options, a judge would no doubt be reluctant to stop a persons livelihood regardless of the situation and a franchisor would require an injunction to enforce the non competing clause costing around £10k.In most cases it's probably best to let them walk, not all clients leave and you'd be better channelling the funds & energy into moving forwards.Most important of all you would hopefully learn how to improve the system to create such value that prevents such things from reoccurring, however I'm not sure any system is full proof, if you decide to grow you just need to work out which system suits you best and hang on for a bumpy ride!HTHJohn
The main thing I've noticed when this is talked about is that when the topic of who's buying into this crops up the answer is you must be sure they are the right kind of people before you let them but into it,I think what that means in the kindest possible way is to make sure they are not to ambitious and to try a sniff out the ones who you think may cause problems like running off with the work because deep down the cost and the hassle of getting it back and policing it all if they are ripping you off is almost impossible to deal with. How on earth could you ever know if they are doing a house without telling you if they said that customer was lost from you yourself but they carried on cleaning it,IMO you are being very very careful who you sell this to because anyone with half a brain would be able to rip you off. Ok you threaten them with legal action it will cost you money in legal fees and like I say the Hassle involved would be a nightmare,all the comments on here are pro this but I would love to know the truth with people that have had the other end of the crappy stick.