Unprovable claims - 'numpty' is a fair description.
Unprovable to me being, keeps windows cleaner for longer, makes glass shine brighter, makes you able to work quicker, makes cleaning easier, makes water run off the glass quicker.
You'll note all the words used to make these claims are in fact subjective. Brighter - brighter than what? Quicker - quicker than what? They're unprovable statements. They cannot be proven either way. Positively or negatively.
I've been using GG4 at a rate of 5ml per 100 litres for the past month. I makes cleaning, as a whole, a more pleasurable and effective experience. What I cannot abide though is someone making unfounded and unproven claims and then failing to prove them either way or backing down when repeatedly asked to offer up proof as to the accuracy of their claims. To me Vision and any other micro diluted 'cleaning agent' work by breaking down the surface tension.
Unprovable claims? What exactly is it your after?
Kempy has the patience of a Saint dealing with you guys. (By guys I mean you and Sean)
My wife always uses fairy liquid to wash the dishes (occasionally I help
) but why does she use fairy? Can she prove to me it works better than lidls own? No not really. Could she achieve the same results with just hot water? Possibly?
She uses it because she likes it better than other brands.
She uses it, she likes it, so she keeps using it.
its not a very good analogy but hopefully you can see the point.
When it comes to cleaning products it's hard to micro analyse and show in video or picture form (which i ASSume thats what you want) that it works.
If you like it..... Use it.
If you don't? ...... Don't. It's really that simple. The best results are the ones that you can see with your nose to the glass yourself.
Just to clarify seank when I said hundreds of people using vision that are happy, I meant 100's per month. So yes even I can do the maths, that is thousands of window cleaners using vision.
But no you and quarter light are probably right. It's the other 99.9% who are wrong.