This is from your own quote:
a paid endorsed cheque is as good evidence of payment as is a simple receipt.
You said that a cheque IS a receipt.
I said, it is not a receipt, but may in some circumstances, provide a similar function as a receipt.
For example it may be used 'as good evidence of payment' but that still does not mean that a cheque IS a receipt.
Which one of our statements is backed up by that quote from the Lords debate? Mine or yours?
Note the phrase in the quote "as good as". Not "IS"