This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

8weekly

Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #100 on: February 05, 2015, 04:35:26 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.
What you actually said was that on standard windows trad is quicker. That's nonsense. I can see on a first clean trad may be quicker, but if you later WFP it, you still have to clean it twice as trad won't clean the frames deep enough. On a one off minger trad might be quicker I would accept.

Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #101 on: February 05, 2015, 04:47:38 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.

Aww thanks for the mention. Sadly I don't swing your way. Terribly sorry. But keep thinking of me as dirty and disgusting. Bet you spend ages in the shower thinking about it.

 :-\

gary999

  • Posts: 8156
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #102 on: February 05, 2015, 05:26:56 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.
What you actually said was that on standard windows trad is quicker. That's nonsense. I can see on a first clean trad may be quicker, but if you later WFP it, you still have to clean it twice as trad won't clean the frames deep enough. On a one off minger trad might be quicker I would accept.
I would agree mostly with the above 8weekly I cant see trad being the same
speed or quicker if you take a like for like clean especially with depth of clean you
can get with wfp.

I clean some real mingers I turn the flow up or better still I plug into customers
tap if available and blast away whether brush gets caked  in crap is irrelevant
it barely slows me down from a normal clean...and it is physically less hardwork
and defo safer.

Jakey boy

  • Posts: 869
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #103 on: February 05, 2015, 06:09:50 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.

Aww thanks for the mention. Sadly I don't swing your way. Terribly sorry. But keep thinking of me as dirty and disgusting. Bet you spend ages in the shower thinking about it.

 :-\

Funnily how you instantly turn such comments into some sort of sexual reference? I'm not the one doing that, it's always you or Garry? You've both got some issue with talking about me in a sexual way. Are you incapable of talking normally about window cleaning? Are you seeking help for that visit you took to Chernobyl? Because your brain is confused, and your sexuality is also very confused, you like to talk about men in a sexual way on a window cleaning forum?  ???

Get your head examined hummer, those brain cells are deteriorating fast.

And... Why are you talking about me in the shower? Leave your gay thoughts to your self pal.

8weekly

Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #104 on: February 05, 2015, 06:13:21 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.

Aww thanks for the mention. Sadly I don't swing your way. Terribly sorry. But keep thinking of me as dirty and disgusting. Bet you spend ages in the shower thinking about it.

 :-\

Funnily how you instantly turn such comments into some sort of sexual reference? I'm not the one doing that, it's always you or Garry? You've both got some issue with taking about me in a sexual way, batty boys! Are you incapable of taking normally about window cleaning? Are you seeking help for that visit you took to Chernobyl? Because your brain is confused, and your sexuality is also very confused, you like to talk about men in a sexual way on a window cleaning forum?  ???

Get your head examined hummer, those brain cells are deteriorating fast.
Reading the quoted thread, it was you that brought up "sex" as you called Hummer "filthy and disgusting". I agree that he is irritating but you started the "pillow talk".   ;)

Joey Eastwood

  • Posts: 400
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #105 on: February 05, 2015, 06:18:36 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.

im up for a race, same sized house both from the same starting point, by the time kit was ready and hoses reeled out etc id be half done ;) lol. your not allowed an unrivaled opinion here jakey, if someone says something and no 'buiscuit muncher' or know (fack) it all questions it then the forum crashes ;)
when life throws you water, clean windows

Jakey boy

  • Posts: 869
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #106 on: February 05, 2015, 06:20:20 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.

im up for a race, same sized house both from the same starting point, by the time kit was ready and hoses reeled out etc id be half done ;) lol. your not allowed an unrivaled opinion here jakey, if someone says something and no 'buiscuit muncher' or know (fack) it all questions it then the forum crashes ;)

I think trad would win  ;)

Tom White

Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #107 on: February 05, 2015, 06:21:21 pm »

im up for a race, same sized house both from the same starting point, by the time kit was ready and hoses reeled out etc id be half done ;) lol.

No, mate.  By the time you get your ladders off, bucket out, belt kit on, I'm on the glass.  I've only got to open my back doors, then walk to the property with pole and hose.  

Don't worry, the speed will come, mate, just keep plugging away and put some thought into how you can make the jobs you do quicker and easier.

Jonny 87

  • Posts: 3488
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #108 on: February 05, 2015, 06:21:49 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.

http://youtu.be/6vXV1zhmVao

Your turn to show us a video. :)

Place your bets now.....

I bet you won't show us your "skills".

 ;D
Vision Technician / Visual Engineer /  Vision Enhancement Operative /...........................................................OnlyUseMeWFP AkA Jonny the Windy Wesher

Jakey boy

  • Posts: 869
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #109 on: February 05, 2015, 06:21:53 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.

Aww thanks for the mention. Sadly I don't swing your way. Terribly sorry. But keep thinking of me as dirty and disgusting. Bet you spend ages in the shower thinking about it.

 :-\

Funnily how you instantly turn such comments into some sort of sexual reference? I'm not the one doing that, it's always you or Garry? You've both got some issue with taking about me in a sexual way, batty boys! Are you incapable of taking normally about window cleaning? Are you seeking help for that visit you took to Chernobyl? Because your brain is confused, and your sexuality is also very confused, you like to talk about men in a sexual way on a window cleaning forum?  ???

Get your head examined hummer, those brain cells are deteriorating fast.
Reading the quoted thread, it was you that brought up "sex" as you called Hummer "filthy and disgusting". I agree that he is irritating but you started the "pillow talk".   ;)

The windows were filthy and disgusting, and hummer is the same just dirt. Nothing sexual about that!

Jakey boy

  • Posts: 869
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #110 on: February 05, 2015, 06:23:32 pm »

im up for a race, same sized house both from the same starting point, by the time kit was ready and hoses reeled out etc id be half done ;) lol.

No, mate.  By the time you get your ladders off, bucket out, belt kit on, I'm on the glass.  I've only got to open my back doors, then walk to the property with pole and hose.  

Don't worry, the speed will come, mate, just keep plugging away and put some thought into how you can make the jobs you do quicker and easier.

Err tosh, I think you'll find joey doesn't use wfp...

Joey Eastwood

  • Posts: 400
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #111 on: February 05, 2015, 06:24:00 pm »

im up for a race, same sized house both from the same starting point, by the time kit was ready and hoses reeled out etc id be half done ;) lol.

No, mate.  By the time you get your ladders off, bucket out, belt kit on, I'm on the glass.  I've only got to open my back doors, then walk to the property with pole and hose.  

Don't worry, the speed will come, mate, just keep plugging away and put some thought into how you can make the jobs you do quicker and easier.

no  mate, dont wear a belt, im not homosexual, and my ladders are off in 20seconds and bucket is in passenger footwell, i would beat you hands down doing a proper job that is, your probably  very quick at doing a bodge job, keep plugging away one day you will do it right  ;D
when life throws you water, clean windows

Jakey boy

  • Posts: 869
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #112 on: February 05, 2015, 06:26:04 pm »

im up for a race, same sized house both from the same starting point, by the time kit was ready and hoses reeled out etc id be half done ;) lol.

No, mate.  By the time you get your ladders off, bucket out, belt kit on, I'm on the glass.  I've only got to open my back doors, then walk to the property with pole and hose.  

Don't worry, the speed will come, mate, just keep plugging away and put some thought into how you can make the jobs you do quicker and easier.

no  mate, dont wear a belt, im not homosexual, and my ladders are off in 20seconds and bucket is in passenger footwell, i would beat you hands down doing a proper job that is, your probably  very quick at doing a bodge job, keep plugging away one day you will do it right  ;D

Exactly!

I also don't wear all those stupid gadgets. Blade and applicator with ladder and scrim. Nothing else.

Don Kee

  • Posts: 4879
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #113 on: February 05, 2015, 06:27:03 pm »
You hero...
Why don't you have a quick google before making stupid comments?

Jakey boy

  • Posts: 869
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #114 on: February 05, 2015, 06:27:56 pm »
Everyone just work the way they want to .
Take advice and learn from others .
But persons should appreciate how persons work .

We're all different and have different needs and work methods

Yes, I agree, but that's not the discussion here.

But wfp is still faster for the vast majority of external window cleaning.

If someone isn't finding that is it, they're doing it wrong.

It's also easier too.

I think it the windows are particular dirty, especially the upstairs, then trad is quicker, today I did a new house which was filthy and disgusting. A bit like hummer. Anyway, there was no way wfp was going to be quicker, the brush would have been cakes in crap, and trad was by far the easier option. I could wipe the frames and then do the window quickly with a very good result, wfp would have left spotting due to how dirty it was around the frames etc. wfp could of worked but I know from expirence it would have taken longer,

I would love you race a wfp guy on certain houses and compare results!

Remember at the beginning I stated that I find trad quicker on 'some houses' not all.

http://youtu.be/6vXV1zhmVao

Your turn to show us a video. :)

Place your bets now.....

I bet you won't show us your "skills".

 ;D

That's a bodge job Jonny. Plus as I said its certain houses that are quicker trad, not this type, I said normal windows without squares or double paynes with dividers etx. I use my wfp for that type of window.

Tom White

Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #115 on: February 05, 2015, 06:28:20 pm »

Err tosh, I think you'll find joey doesn't use wfp...

Ah, I see, so he's feeling inadequate.  He's probably feeling a bit daft with his ladders on a pram, watching guys with flash vans zoom past him.

But as soon as he can afford a system, he'll be doing it.

We used to have these discussions with Squeaky - and he reckoned he was faster trad than we were with a wfp.

He's been using wfp for a few years now. ;D

Joey Eastwood

  • Posts: 400
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #116 on: February 05, 2015, 06:29:02 pm »
You hero...

i can be your hero baby, i can kiss away your pain  :-*p
when life throws you water, clean windows

Tom White

Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #117 on: February 05, 2015, 06:30:21 pm »
I also don't wear all those stupid gadgets. Blade and applicator with ladder and scrim. Nothing else.

I found a scraper came in handy.

Don Kee

  • Posts: 4879
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #118 on: February 05, 2015, 06:31:14 pm »
Don't i'm getting aroused now...

Why don't you have a quick google before making stupid comments?

Jakey boy

  • Posts: 869
Re: Still find trad quicker for some houses...
« Reply #119 on: February 05, 2015, 06:32:19 pm »
I also don't wear all those stupid gadgets. Blade and applicator with ladder and scrim. Nothing else.

I found a scraper came in handy.

Scrapers in the bum bag,

Love to see a wfp guy get stuck with hard stains. Trad dominates then too. Hate it when I'm using the wfp and there's a hard mark that won't come off. Another point to trad... ;D