This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Scott Taylor

  • Posts: 89
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #20 on: January 27, 2015, 04:58:06 pm »
Some good points there. I always get the client to agree via email to my payment terms  but maybe this is not enough. I do a lot more domestic but the odd commercial client and I've maybe been lucky. Does anyone have a contract template they can send or give me some advice? Thanks

JetVac Cleaning

  • Posts: 266
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #21 on: January 27, 2015, 09:54:49 pm »
After a phone call with the muppet I'm having issues with he has now told me he's only paying half my invoice as he has not earned much out of it! I quickly reminded him of the agreement and that I will not be accepting what he is saying! I'm giving him till Friday to pay up and if he doesn't he's going to see my face on his doorstep. If he still doesn't pay then he's going to get badly hurt and 2 Morrisons stores that he has Not payed me for are going to get everything I done reversed. I think this might embarrass him slightly when I inform the store managers the reason why he has human waste back under his fridges

Scott Blaney

  • Posts: 42
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2015, 10:37:26 pm »
After a phone call with the muppet I'm having issues with he has now told me he's only paying half my invoice as he has not earned much out of it! I quickly reminded him of the agreement and that I will not be accepting what he is saying! I'm giving him till Friday to pay up and if he doesn't he's going to see my face on his doorstep. If he still doesn't pay then he's going to get badly hurt and 2 Morrisons stores that he has Not payed me for are going to get everything I done reversed. I think this might embarrass him slightly when I inform the store managers the reason why he has human waste back under his fridges

The bigger the company, the worse they are at paying in my experience.  they think the smaller guys are push overs and will walk away to save the hassle etc.

A large estate & letting agent tried to do me for 5 grand, only paying after their head office down south got a solicitor chapping at their door with legal paperwork.

JetVac Cleaning

  • Posts: 266
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #23 on: February 01, 2015, 11:20:12 pm »
Well after informing him that on Tuesday I will be returning these stores back to how I found them and mentioning that I will also let the store managers know exactly why I have done it the money appeared in my bank account! It just goes to show if you can find a way of damaging there relationship with there client then you also have them by the bo****ks. What I can guarantee is that if he contacts me again he will get told to do one.

Essex Power Washing

  • Posts: 68
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #24 on: February 02, 2015, 08:22:11 pm »
I have just seen this post I carry a none payment tin of paint it's white with knocker on it contains yellow floor paint. Had to show it once to an Indian customer funny he paid the £80 quid try it it's fun

Churchill Contract Cleaners

  • Posts: 24
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #25 on: February 03, 2015, 12:36:27 pm »
Beware of APP Construction based in Leeds.  We carried out builders cleans for them and their payment is so poor.  Excuse after excuse, not answering calls, same answer that no bodies ever in their office.  And when they have made payment to us its short!  All work was done, complete and signed off plus a return for snagging and they still argued over the invoice.
They try to impose their own terms and cheque payment which we stated at the start we do not accept.
Nationwide Contract Cleaners | Daily Office Cleaning Nottingham
www.churchillcleaners.co.uk  Tel: 0115 8372840

Bill.upnw

  • Posts: 293
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #26 on: February 03, 2015, 02:25:19 pm »
http://www.hendhamhousehotel.co.uk/

stay away from this company in manchester, ripped me off when it came to paying, even had to cheek to ask for my bank card number and security code so they could ''make payment''

managers called Amanda, some big black woman obviously into credit card fraud as she was trying it with me, was tempted to go and do some damage to the property but thought i would just let karma catch up with them. basterds i was fresh meat then aswell ide only been set up myself for a few months.

serj shergill

  • Posts: 167
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #27 on: February 10, 2015, 04:39:22 pm »
Chaps, does it really matter if a non payer is black, white or Asian ? do we really need to include their ethnicity?  :)

BDCS

  • Posts: 4777
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #28 on: February 10, 2015, 09:01:39 pm »
I, being a condemned forum racist have a certain group of people who only ever need me on the days I'm fully booked which saves me getting knocked when it comes to invoice settlement time  ;)

We all have the right to run our business and I'm not aware of any legislation that forces us to do business with anybody who you think may not pay you. How you allocate these groups is up to you. I have an equal rights policy which I adhere to strictly  ;)


JetVac Cleaning

  • Posts: 266
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #29 on: February 10, 2015, 11:14:32 pm »
The Pratt only sent me a email asking if I could take on more work and he will agree to the 30 day terms. Eeeeerrrrrrrmmmm No!! .

Andrew Collins

  • Posts: 1
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #30 on: February 16, 2015, 02:32:13 pm »
Matt, I am writing in response to your latest post as with Richard Leeks, this is a statement beyond the truth and not a fair comment representing a defamatory statement.  We wrote to you in July last year requesting full details of owed payments, didnt get a reply and subsequently your request for payment has been on hold since then.

If you can kindly respond to our email with details of balance we will credit what you are owed.


Richard - we agreed much web development work for the remainder of your balance which was offered way below market rates with you getting much more than the value of your owed invoice.  Such a statement throws in the face of our wide ranging development work that had a retail value of many thousands of pounds. 

I feel like authorising the removal of your web work to date which will immediately happen unless you immediately accept and admit that we owe you nothing.  If not we will pull all of the web work we have done for you and follow up your slanderous comments with our legal team.  Play fair Richard you got way more than your moneys worth.

This is not the first time you have bad mouthed our respected agency and we will not tolerate such abuse of our brands credibility.


Best wishes,
Green Street Media

www.greenstreetmedia.eu


www.greenstreetmedia.eu

Avoid. The guy is a w@nker.

Richy L

  • Posts: 2257
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #31 on: February 16, 2015, 04:30:51 pm »
Andrew Collins, Conrad, what ever your name is...
The full balance was not settled.

As you were unable to pay me the amount invoiced for the work carried out I did agree to a couple of websites and £430 paid via bank transfer. The websites were created, although it seems as if you have removed one of them! despite promise after promise, the £430 was never transferred. Therefore, you backed out of our deal.
If you transfer the £430 into my account as per our agreement, I will happily admit that you owe me nothing.

alfie11

Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #32 on: February 16, 2015, 04:50:58 pm »
www.greenstreetmedia.eu

Avoid. The guy is a winker.


 ;D

Tom White

Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #33 on: February 16, 2015, 05:05:02 pm »
www.greenstreetmedia.eu

Avoid. The guy is a w@nker.

Agreed.
Agreee. Never work for this guy! And if you do never accept a cheque!

There's been a complaint from greenstreetmedia saying this is all lies and he's threatening legal action.

I've replied that one of the other mods may remove it, but since three people are saying the same thing - one of whom I know personally (Richy L and know him to be trustworthy), I'm leaving it.

Maybe you guys would like to expand upon your experience with this company to help warn others?

Tom White

Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #34 on: February 16, 2015, 05:06:03 pm »
And moderate your language guys; swearing - even with asterixes - aint allowed.

You flippin' gimps.  (See what I did there?  I used alternative euphemistic language.)

Richy L

  • Posts: 2257
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #35 on: February 16, 2015, 05:28:21 pm »
I've emailed you conrad to try to sort out the payment.
I'm assuming you are using the same email address.

BDCS

  • Posts: 4777
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #36 on: February 16, 2015, 05:56:46 pm »
And moderate your language guys; swearing - even with asterixes - aint allowed.

You flippin' gimps.  (See what I did there?  I used alternative euphemistic language.)

Tosh - would You moderate your language on here please - I doubt any of us lot know what "euphemistic" means let alone construct a sentance with it in context.

Matt Gibson

  • Posts: 2482
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #37 on: February 16, 2015, 06:18:36 pm »
Matt, I am writing in response to your latest post as with Richard Leeks, this is a statement beyond the truth and not a fair comment representing a defamatory statement.  We wrote to you in July last year requesting full details of owed payments, didnt get a reply and subsequently your request for payment has been on hold since then.


www.greenstreetmedia.eu

Avoid. The guy is a w@nker.

Andrew,

I have received your email, and replied, with a copy of the outstanding invoice attached. Note the original invoice date please. I have been in contact with Conrad over Facebook and he has promised that it would be paid in full on numerous occasions, so i find the statement of you not being notified, a little hard to believe. I have sent numerous emails, to both Conrad, and various email addresses he has given me, but to no avail. You mention that my email was found in your junk folder? I also run a business, an I, along with a lot of other business owners, know nowadays to check your junk for anything the email program misses, and i would have thought for a Company such as yourselves that would have been common practice.

As stated, I have had many promises from Conrad, some as recently as 25th November 2014, So i do not accept that lack of communication is the cause for this late payment.

Hope this helps to clear things up with you, and also Toshimoto. Apologies for the swearing mate.  :D

Kev Martin

  • Posts: 6954
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #38 on: February 18, 2015, 06:34:18 pm »
Matt, I am writing in response to your latest post as with Richard Leeks, this is a statement beyond the truth and not a fair comment representing a defamatory statement.  We wrote to you in July last year requesting full details of owed payments, didnt get a reply and subsequently your request for payment has been on hold since then.

If you can kindly respond to our email with details of balance we will credit what you are owed.


Richard - we agreed much web development work for the remainder of your balance which was offered way below market rates with you getting much more than the value of your owed invoice.  Such a statement throws in the face of our wide ranging development work that had a retail value of many thousands of pounds. 

I feel like authorising the removal of your web work to date which will immediately happen unless you immediately accept and admit that we owe you nothing.  If not we will pull all of the web work we have done for you and follow up your slanderous comments with our legal team.  Play fair Richard you got way more than your moneys worth.

This is not the first time you have bad mouthed our respected agency and we will not tolerate such abuse of our brands credibility.


Best wishes,
Green Street Media

www.greenstreetmedia.eu


www.greenstreetmedia.eu

Avoid. The guy is a w@nker.

Actually you need to read this:

Defamation Per Se

Some statements of fact are so egregious that they will always be considered defamatory. Such statements are typically referred to as defamation "per se." These types of statements are assumed to harm the plaintiff's reputation, without further need to prove that harm. Statements are defamatory per se where they falsely impute to the plaintiff one or more of the following things:

    a criminal offence;

    a loathsome disease;

    matter incompatible with his business, trade, profession, or office; or

    serious sexual misconduct.


It is important to remember that truth is an absolute defense to defamation, including per se defamation. If the statement is true, it cannot be defamatory.

Kevin
"Natural Stone Restoration Specialists" Tel: 0121 773 9129
www.tilinglogistics.co.uk | www.marblelife.co.uk  http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Tiling-Logistics

chris scott

  • Posts: 3414
Re: Pi$$ Takers
« Reply #39 on: February 18, 2015, 06:51:16 pm »
Matt, I am writing in response to your latest post as with Richard Leeks, this is a statement beyond the truth and not a fair comment representing a defamatory statement.  We wrote to you in July last year requesting full details of owed payments, didnt get a reply and subsequently your request for payment has been on hold since then.

If you can kindly respond to our email with details of balance we will credit what you are owed.


Richard - we agreed much web development work for the remainder of your balance which was offered way below market rates with you getting much more than the value of your owed invoice.  Such a statement throws in the face of our wide ranging development work that had a retail value of many thousands of pounds. 

I feel like authorising the removal of your web work to date which will immediately happen unless you immediately accept and admit that we owe you nothing.  If not we will pull all of the web work we have done for you and follow up your slanderous comments with our legal team.  Play fair Richard you got way more than your moneys worth.

This is not the first time you have bad mouthed our respected agency and we will not tolerate such abuse of our brands credibility.


Best wishes,
Green Street Media

www.greenstreetmedia.eu


www.greenstreetmedia.eu

Avoid. The guy is a w@nker.

Actually you need to read this:

Defamation Per Se

Some statements of fact are so egregious that they will always be considered defamatory. Such statements are typically referred to as defamation "per se." These types of statements are assumed to harm the plaintiff's reputation, without further need to prove that harm. Statements are defamatory per se where they falsely impute to the plaintiff one or more of the following things:

    a criminal offence;

    a loathsome disease;

    matter incompatible with his business, trade, profession, or office; or

    serious sexual misconduct.


It is important to remember that truth is an absolute defense to defamation, including per se defamation. If the statement is true, it cannot be defamatory.

Kevin
Kevin will you be my friend and solicitor?
3 people from different areas of the country ..who possibly have never met. Have all come to the same conclusion regarding www.greenstreetmedia.eu from that I will form my own opinion.
www.cleaning-service.uk.com
www.render-cleaning.co
https://www.cleaning-service.uk.com/bromoco-systems/
Exterior cleaning specialists covering Merseyside,Lancashire and Cheshire. TEL 08000 933267