This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

johnny bravo

  • Posts: 2699
FAO ALEX GARDINER
« on: January 05, 2015, 12:40:06 pm »
Alex can you let me know if i can add another section to my clx 27,      i have added a section 7 onto it atm for higher jobs,
Can you let me know if you have a section 8,      i have a job to quote      but i am around 3 feet short on the pole to reach top sections.
thanks.

cant quote unless i can add extra lengh.     i will have to leave.

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7742
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2015, 01:33:00 pm »
Alex can you let me know if i can add another section to my clx 27,      i have added a section 7 onto it atm for higher jobs,
Can you let me know if you have a section 8,      i have a job to quote      but i am around 3 feet short on the pole to reach top sections.
thanks.

cant quote unless i can add extra lengh.     i will have to leave.

Hi Johnny

Whilst it would not be the best for the job at this height it can be done. You can add an SLX Extension Section #8 on which will give you about an extra 4.5ft (£72+VAT).

I would love to give you a website link for this item, but we have had some website database issues over the weekend and this is why the new website and order software systems are not back online as they were due to be. It will probably be midday tomorrow now.

johnny bravo

  • Posts: 2699
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2015, 02:13:26 pm »
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height

johnny bravo

  • Posts: 2699
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2015, 02:16:33 pm »
have you added these extentions onto a clx27 to see what the problems might occur if i did this

thanks 4 your help so quickly,   if it may cause me problems ill not quote.

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7742
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2015, 02:41:33 pm »
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height

It is only because the pole at 36ft would not be the most rigid option to work with. Technically there would be no issues at all if you are OK with the flex.

tlwcs

  • Posts: 2088
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2015, 02:54:42 pm »
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height

It is only because the pole at 36ft would not be the most rigid option to work with. Technically there would be no issues at all if you are OK with the flex.

Alex, how scary is it to have no orders coming in, sorry to o/p  ;D ;D

johnny bravo

  • Posts: 2699
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2015, 02:55:39 pm »
so how big is the pole clx27    with the section 7 added.
sorry for all questions but i just want to make sure its worth getting section 8

thanks

johnny bravo

  • Posts: 2699
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #7 on: January 05, 2015, 02:56:53 pm »
ill give a quote tomorrow,    if i get it ill order the section 8,
have you these in stock

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7742
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2015, 03:50:11 pm »
so how big is the pole clx27    with the section 7 added.
sorry for all questions but i just want to make sure its worth getting section 8

thanks

The CLX27 with Section#7 fitted is about 31ft. With a section #8 fitted as well this would be about 35.5ft

Alex Gardiner

  • Posts: 7742
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2015, 03:58:18 pm »
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height

It is only because the pole at 36ft would not be the most rigid option to work with. Technically there would be no issues at all if you are OK with the flex.

Alex, how scary is it to have no orders coming in, sorry to o/p  ;D ;D

Not too bad as I am so busy I do not have time to think about it right now  :)

PoleKing

  • Posts: 8974
Re: FAO ALEX GARDINER
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2015, 07:53:54 pm »
can you explain why it would not be the best idea to add an eighth section for that height.
would it cause complications on the pole itself. at that height

It is only because the pole at 36ft would not be the most rigid option to work with. Technically there would be no issues at all if you are OK with the flex.

Alex, how scary is it to have no orders coming in, sorry to o/p  ;D ;D

Not too bad as I am so busy I do not have time to think about it right now  :)

And probably everyone who wants kit will just've waited so tomorrow will turnover c.£1m. ;D

www.LanesWindowCleaning.com

It's just the internet. Try not to worry.