I'm in the same boat I don't and don't want to work in temps below minus one so hot doesn't really appeal to
me for this reason.
But the one advertised is as cheap as chips so might give it a try just to see if it makes things any easier.
For me to consider using a gas heater then it has to cover both the extra cost plus the added risk of working with gas.
I still haven't been able to work out what monetary figure this would need to be.
Would be nice to have a discussion on how mush extra work the hot users get done since converting to hot, not
in money as this would start another willy waving exercise but in a percentage.
It like anything else wfp related. How can you put a value on working with a carbon fiber pole over a fiber glass pole. You can't prove that you are going to be able to do ex number of houses a day with a lighter stiffer pole.
When we first bought carbon poles the maths showed that the new poles would pay for themselves very quickly if their purchase allowed us to clean a couple of extra houses a day.
For me, the main reason for wanting to go 'hot' is just to make working in the cold a little easier. The hoses are more flexible and the warm water does warm the pole as well.
So for me I don't want someone to prove that it cleans better. I don't want to listen to the sales pitch - you don't wash your dishes in cold water do you? So why do you wash.......................?
For me it just making my working environment in the winter a little more pleasant.
I fitted an air diesel heater into my van many years ago. It warms the cabin. If its especially cold out, I can fire it up and retreat to a warm van for a few minutes to 'thaw' out.
I can't ever justify the expense, but on cold days it keeps me going a little longer.