This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

rah

  • Posts: 670
Re: Which static 40" Ro with low waste?
« Reply #20 on: September 17, 2013, 08:52:15 am »
Life used to be full of up's and downs....now i hardly ever get up a ladder :) .

Fin Clearview

  • Posts: 929
Re: Which static 40" Ro with low waste?
« Reply #21 on: September 17, 2013, 02:44:50 pm »
Are the prf ones anygood.
Good flow by the sounds of it.nice price and says it produces 75% less waste water.

Sorry mate but what does prf mean?

^ Cheers Rob - gaps say 70%waste to 30% pure is the correct ratio, Jesus I think I'll go back on the tools!!

andy east sussex

  • Posts: 1146
Re: Which static 40" Ro with low waste?
« Reply #22 on: September 17, 2013, 02:46:45 pm »
which ones are most of you using hf4 or 5

Fin Clearview

  • Posts: 929
Re: Which static 40" Ro with low waste?
« Reply #23 on: September 17, 2013, 02:53:09 pm »
I'm thinking of going for the 5 as I have about 50psi.

windiewasher

  • Posts: 4393
Re: Which static 40" Ro with low waste?
« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2013, 04:25:16 pm »
Takings off all first cleans till march 7th 2014
October  total=  cleaned  extra per month
November = cleaned extra per month
Total £  so far.

lyndy

  • Posts: 384
Re: Which static 40" Ro with low waste?
« Reply #25 on: September 17, 2013, 06:20:53 pm »
Is that all you would need,plus tank and di vessel?

Fin Clearview

  • Posts: 929
Re: Which static 40" Ro with low waste?
« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2013, 08:33:25 pm »
http://www.gapswater.co.uk/acatalog/GE_Merlin_reverse_osmosis_system.html
Heres the one says 75% less waste

Interesting...Surely these havent been around long, everybody seems to own a hf4/5. I called gaps today and they reccomended the starter kit hf5 with fibre dyne.

Re: Which static 40" Ro with low waste?
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2013, 08:42:16 pm »
Its a catch 22 two membranes and the cost of running second will save 25% maybe and save water at what worth as the second one will cost you the same if not more that the water you would possibly save. ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???