Could someone explain to me why they think it necessary to make so much from adding an extra person. I can't think any other industry where you wouldn't bother hiring someone cause they can only make you £12,000 a year more profit.
But it's not £12000 a year extra profit. It's £12000 a year extra turn over.
Andy
Andy and smudger,
Unfortunately you are getting your business jargon incorrect.
To clarify a typical example let us presume the employee does a 8 hour working day.
Of that he is on the windows for seven hours.
Presume he works for 46 weeks of the year.
He will produce 25 an hour for those seven hours.
Therefore he generates 40,250 in turnover. Not 12,000 as stated by you two.
I accept that there will be days when it will rain but he can canvass in those times and/or take the time off to catch it up later. So I will still get the £40,250 worth of generated income for the year.
I also stated that it could be quite easy to find someone who has their own van so their would be no additional costs regarding van etc.
From this point I am more than happy to be corrected on the benefits of such a person but how would he be any different to a sole trader who goes and cleans windows. If someone is to suggest he can't generate £40k a year, then why can everyone else on here do that so easily.. The main difference in putting on the employer is to keep the difference to what he will work for and what a sole trader will work for.
Also from another post it was suggested that an employee on £10 an hour will effectively cost about £35k so would it be safe to presume that if I increase his glass time to £30 an hour then I would therefore generate £48,300. That would give me £12k.
Perhaps it is being suggested that the employee may need to make say £30 an hour to make it worthwhile.