[SunShineCleaning]

http://www.fwcsos.com/1/post/2013/07/hosepipe-ban-latest.html

[Paul Coleman]

http://www.fwcsos.com/1/post/2013/07/hosepipe-ban-latest.html

Well that was an unnecesary load of bull.
I wasted 30 seconds of my life reading it and a further 60 seconds writing this.
One of the reasons I have much less to do with this forum these days.

[rosskesava]

http://www.fwcsos.com/1/post/2013/07/hosepipe-ban-latest.html

Jeepers. Yawn. How pathetic and what a pile of complete twaddle and what idiot was responsible for writing that rubbish in the mistaken idea that it would get the FWC cudos points?.

Maybe the FWC should also write articles for the Daily Express or the Daily Mail.

[SunShineCleaning]

We are debating the future of our trade organization. It would be great to have backing when these types of issues crop up.

They will this year. Maybe if the FWC were proactive rather than reactive information to address such issues could be disseminated before it becomes a big issue.

[andyM]

We are debating the future of our trade organization. It would be great to have backing when these types of issues crop up.

They will this year. Maybe if the FWC were proactive rather than reactive information to address such issues could be disseminated before it becomes a big issue.

I agree.

[formb]

We are debating the future of our trade organization. It would be great to have backing when these types of issues crop up.

They will this year. Maybe if the FWC were proactive rather than reactive information to address such issues could be disseminated before it becomes a big issue.

Nice  

[wfp master]

Surprised its took this long for this to pop up.
Every year is same.

[EandM]

' With a forecast of 7 a week heatwave ' - Are we going to have seven of them a week then ? Needs less speculation and a better proof reader.

[SunShineCleaning]

We are debating the future of our trade organization. It would be great to have backing when these types of issues crop up.

They will this year. Maybe if the FWC were proactive rather than reactive information to address such issues could be disseminated before it becomes a big issue.

Nice  

[formb]

We are debating the future of our trade organization. It would be great to have backing when these types of issues crop up.

They will this year. Maybe if the FWC were proactive rather than reactive information to address such issues could be disseminated before it becomes a big issue.

Nice  

disseminated

Quality wordage.

[SunShineCleaning]

' With a forecast of 7 a week heatwave ' - Are we going to have seven of them a week then ? Needs less speculation and a better proof reader.

One 7 week heatwave is forcast, why have you quoted it that way?

[SunShineCleaning]

We are debating the future of our trade organization. It would be great to have backing when these types of issues crop up.

They will this year. Maybe if the FWC were proactive rather than reactive information to address such issues could be disseminated before it becomes a big issue.

Nice  

disseminated

Quality wordage.

Ah, I'm so paranoid I thought it was a dig.

[formb]

No need to be paranoid. This forum is a laugh to most people. There was a time I let comments from here wind me up. There is no point. You put posts up trying to help people and get torn apart for it. It has happened to me in the past. Don't worry about it, it is unimportant in the real world.

[MATT BATEMAN (OWC)]

+1

[trevor perry]

I believe the fed did a lot of work when we where threatened by a water ban last time so why post something mocking the fed oh I know why dirty tactics undermining the fed so you and Andrew can try to force a takeover and implicate more rules regulation and costs for all us gullable window cleaners.
  Just go and start your own organisation if you both do your job as good as your promising you will soon get lots to join including myself but the proof is in the pudding I cant see why ALL committee members should stand down to give Andrew and whoever he decides free reign, it would be like giving a machine gun to a monkey, you have already stated on FWCsos  how when you come on CIU you receive a mauling why not go into a corner smoke a bit more of your belly button fluff and work out the reason why, maybe we are not as gullable as you think.

[jimiwindows]

http://www.fwcsos.com/1/post/2013/07/hosepipe-ban-latest.html

Well that was an unnecesary load of bull.
I wasted 30 seconds of my life reading it and a further 60 seconds writing this.
One of the reasons I have much less to do with this forum these days.

+1

[C o z y]

http://www.fwcsos.com/1/post/2013/07/hosepipe-ban-latest.html

Well that was an unnecesary load of bull.
I wasted 30 seconds of my life reading it and a further 60 seconds writing this.
One of the reasons I have much less to do with this forum these days.

That's why I stay mostly on the nutter section of this forum mate. Good fun there, and no willy waving and horse shyte. 

[*Hector*]

Nutter section??   

how very dare you?? 

we only have boodists, conspiracy theory nuts, alkies runners, and a lot of general muppetry....


hmmm

Yep you are right Nutters section covers it

 

[richard jagger]

I find this forum the most unproductive part of my day. Finding my time spent other places more rewarding.

[rosskesava]

We are debating the future of our trade organization. It would be great to have backing when these types of issues crop up.

They will this year. Maybe if the FWC were proactive rather than reactive information to address such issues could be disseminated before it becomes a big issue.

You have a point there. I was in hind sight wrong to post what I posted which was:

Jeepers. Yawn. How pathetic and what a pile of complete twaddle and what idiot was responsible for writing that rubbish in the mistaken idea that it would get the FWC cudos points?.

Maybe the FWC should also write articles for the Daily Express or the Daily Mail.

Apologies.