This is an advertisement
Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here

Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #20 on: July 12, 2013, 07:22:49 am »
Thanks for posting those pictures would look forward to others posts on what methods they would use.

Trevor, would it be a good idea that those posting

A .......Happy to ID themselves, its easy to hide behind an alias
B .......Knowledge, experience and Qualifications

Whilst posting are you going to challenge the FWC for clear legal status on this issue

Regards


Andrew

  Personally I would leave it up to persons choice whether they post  that information but it would be good if people posted who do have experience of cleaning largish commercial buildings.
   As for challenging the FWC for clear legal status on the issue i cant see a need unless accident statistics start to show there are injuries occurring from falling poles and then I would say there is a need for it to be looked at,  but at present I feel there guidance notes are sufficient.
   You are far more qualified than me and obviously know much more on how a judge would view the situation if an accident occurred but I seriously think a contractor would be hammered no matter what method they used should an accident occur, for instance scenario 1 a WFP falls and hits someone judge verdict you did not put sufficient measures in place to stop falling object. Scenario 2 an accident occurs using cherrypicker whether it be a  minor one are a major one judge verdict why did you use access equipment when job could of been carried out safely from the ground, I know the above is a very simplified version and your risk assessment would be viewed more closely but I cant see how getting legal status on the cordoning of issue would clear up the dilemma
   Once again thanks for posting the pictures,I know people have very strong views on this subject and it often turns into a bash Andrew thread me myself also being guilty of this so please can posters try to raise valid points without getting to personal.
  

Trevor, at last  :)

Thats the point I am making,

Sometimes its not easy to put the right controls in place, and I feel from reading posts over the last year all of us would benefit from clear guidance.

The FWC would want us all to sit down only with the HSE and take guidance, during the workshops I showed the group an example of me completing the duty holder (building risk assessment on Rose Court in London, at the time this was the HSE head office, they had got just about everything wrong, yes thats it the HSE had not set up the property so window cleaners could clean safely.

The window cleaners knew how to clean the property and although my job also on the day was to attend a meeting and advise the window cleaners on the changes they should make, I agreed 100% with the method the window cleaners wanted to use. Result, a new travelling ladder system taken out of commission and the window cleaners allowed to use waterfed pole. Me supporting the withdrawing of using a powered sol sit chair at ten floors and wanting a rope access operation.

My view for what it is worth. It is time for our industry (FWC) to move forward, there is a great Facebook page for any FWC members on CIU to get involved with. Then to sit down with a large group, New starter, residential and domestic, small commercial, large and commercial, have the HSE working at height team, I could invite two senior directors from the two largest property management companies, these guys are about as qualified as you will get, a consultant specialising in all types of access, insurers, underwriters from Lloyds, a qualified legal QC who specialises in Health and Safety and a Judge.

The HSE have a large presentation room where other industries have done like wise when they have issues, I used to represent the FWC at a monthly HSE safety advisory group where one representative would attend from 100's of industry types. I would present the information and then allow all groups to have input, and end at a firm judgement.

For the many CIU posters.

There is a simple question you can always ask yourself, its the basis of any Safety Law

Are you protecting yourself and others, due to your action can you or others come to harm. If they can you need to control this and protect them. If you and others are safe then happy days, show me the money

LWC

  • Posts: 6824
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #21 on: July 12, 2013, 07:41:30 am »
Something else now?

Seriously I couldnt care less about these ridiculous posts. Id prefer to get out and be working that sitting down discussing health and safety with people. This countries gone bonkers...we're window cleaners for goodness sake not rocket scientists.

Work safely and use a bit of common sense...and stop prying into other peoples businesses.

dazmond

  • Posts: 23984
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #22 on: July 12, 2013, 07:55:50 am »
yep i reckon sunshine cleaning is obsessed with elf and safety.the mat over the hose and all them cones in a pic he put up a few weeks ago was so funny!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

price higher/work harder!

windiewasher

  • Posts: 4393
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #23 on: July 12, 2013, 07:59:54 am »
yep i reckon sunshine cleaning is obsessed with elf and safety.the mat over the hose and all them cones in a pic he put up a few weeks ago was so funny!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


+1
definately agree and then on another post hes parked up on a corner on double yellows.lol
Takings off all first cleans till march 7th 2014
October  total=  cleaned  extra per month
November = cleaned extra per month
Total £  so far.

trevor perry

  • Posts: 2454
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #24 on: July 12, 2013, 08:05:27 am »
Andrew from the posts above all have said they would use water fed pole on that job instead of a MEWP, reasons being they thought it safer, cheaper and quicker than using an MEWP, on your course you highlighted all the risks involved in using a pole and how these could be removed by cordoning off a large area when pointed out this was causing a greater risk then you moved on to bringing in access equipment, from all posts above they see using a MEWP carries a larger amount of risk than the first option.
  It would be great if we could eliminate all risk on every job but that is not the case and we just have to work with the best option we have got, having a legal ruling on cordoning off would not solve this issue.
  in the next few week I am carrying a job out at night it is cleaning of a large glass canopy we have done for many years uptil about 3 years ago it was always cleaned by water fed pole from a flat roof at base of canopy, suddenly health and safety got involved and we now have to use 20m MEWP as they decided flat roof access was no longer acceptable, before the job was a doddle now you are getting tangled in harness and pole hose, using the pole at extremely uncomfortable angles whilst trying to lean over to clean glass below you, what could of been done by two men in a couple of hours now takes two men all night an extra £400 in hire charges plus you have had to lift and manoeuvre at what I feel unacceptable angles for large amount of time. My opinion the first option was always safer but because flat roof access has now become a no go on many commercial buildings they have now made this job more dangerous, having a legal ruling on an issue often does away with any common sense and often rules out what would be the best approach.
  I highlighted the job above as I know from your course you feel flat roof access in unacceptable and many of your points where valid ie how do we know for sure the surface we are going to stand on can take our weight and how can this possibly be assessed accurately, I totally agree but sometimes it is still the best option
better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove any doubt

dazmond

  • Posts: 23984
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #25 on: July 12, 2013, 08:05:41 am »
was there not some health and safety video on ladders a few months ago and some elf and safety guru fell off while filming!!NOW THAT WAS FUNNY!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

can someone put a link to it if you know which one i mean? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
price higher/work harder!

trevor perry

  • Posts: 2454
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #26 on: July 12, 2013, 08:12:25 am »
was there not some health and safety video on ladders a few months ago and some elf and safety guru fell off while filming!!NOW THAT WAS FUNNY!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

can someone put a link to it if you know which one i mean? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

 Andrew actually uses this clip on his course, I believe the bloke in the clip was sacked
better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove any doubt

windiewasher

  • Posts: 4393
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #27 on: July 12, 2013, 08:15:58 am »
New courses for mewp to follow shortly  ;D ;D ;D
Takings off all first cleans till march 7th 2014
October  total=  cleaned  extra per month
November = cleaned extra per month
Total £  so far.

MATT BATEMAN (OWC)

  • Posts: 1821
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #28 on: July 12, 2013, 08:45:43 am »
was there not some health and safety video on ladders a few months ago and some elf and safety guru fell off while filming!!NOW THAT WAS FUNNY!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

can someone put a link to it if you know which one i mean? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

 Andrew actually uses this clip on his course, I believe the bloke in the clip was sacked

I would have thought he should have been sent on a course.

MATT BATEMAN (OWC)

  • Posts: 1821
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #29 on: July 12, 2013, 08:47:59 am »
Actually he does look like he's twoting about

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_h4khZIX7jU


He should be sacked for his accent if nothing else.

Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #30 on: July 12, 2013, 08:51:26 am »
Andrew from the posts above all have said they would use water fed pole on that job instead of a MEWP, reasons being they thought it safer, cheaper and quicker than using an MEWP, on your course you highlighted all the risks involved in using a pole and how these could be removed by cordoning off a large area when pointed out this was causing a greater risk then you moved on to bringing in access equipment, from all posts above they see using a MEWP carries a larger amount of risk than the first option.
  It would be great if we could eliminate all risk on every job but that is not the case and we just have to work with the best option we have got, having a legal ruling on cordoning off would not solve this issue.
  in the next few week I am carrying a job out at night it is cleaning of a large glass canopy we have done for many years uptil about 3 years ago it was always cleaned by water fed pole from a flat roof at base of canopy, suddenly health and safety got involved and we now have to use 20m MEWP as they decided flat roof access was no longer acceptable, before the job was a doddle now you are getting tangled in harness and pole hose, using the pole at extremely uncomfortable angles whilst trying to lean over to clean glass below you, what could of been done by two men in a couple of hours now takes two men all night an extra £400 in hire charges plus you have had to lift and manoeuvre at what I feel unacceptable angles for large amount of time. My opinion the first option was always safer but because flat roof access has now become a no go on many commercial buildings they have now made this job more dangerous, having a legal ruling on an issue often does away with any common sense and often rules out what would be the best approach.
  I highlighted the job above as I know from your course you feel flat roof access in unacceptable and many of your points where valid ie how do we know for sure the surface we are going to stand on can take our weight and how can this possibly be assessed accurately, I totally agree but sometimes it is still the best option

Not really, try giving Charlie Price of JVPrice a call he has MEWPs with built in hoses into the machine, designed just for the reason you mention, its about selecting the correct equipment.

Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #31 on: July 12, 2013, 08:54:42 am »
Andrew from the posts above all have said they would use water fed pole on that job instead of a MEWP, reasons being they thought it safer, cheaper and quicker than using an MEWP, on your course you highlighted all the risks involved in using a pole and how these could be removed by cordoning off a large area when pointed out this was causing a greater risk then you moved on to bringing in access equipment, from all posts above they see using a MEWP carries a larger amount of risk than the first option.
  It would be great if we could eliminate all risk on every job but that is not the case and we just have to work with the best option we have got, having a legal ruling on cordoning off would not solve this issue.
  in the next few week I am carrying a job out at night it is cleaning of a large glass canopy we have done for many years uptil about 3 years ago it was always cleaned by water fed pole from a flat roof at base of canopy, suddenly health and safety got involved and we now have to use 20m MEWP as they decided flat roof access was no longer acceptable, before the job was a doddle now you are getting tangled in harness and pole hose, using the pole at extremely uncomfortable angles whilst trying to lean over to clean glass below you, what could of been done by two men in a couple of hours now takes two men all night an extra £400 in hire charges plus you have had to lift and manoeuvre at what I feel unacceptable angles for large amount of time. My opinion the first option was always safer but because flat roof access has now become a no go on many commercial buildings they have now made this job more dangerous, having a legal ruling on an issue often does away with any common sense and often rules out what would be the best approach.
  I highlighted the job above as I know from your course you feel flat roof access in unacceptable and many of your points where valid ie how do we know for sure the surface we are going to stand on can take our weight and how can this possibly be assessed accurately, I totally agree but sometimes it is still the best option

Not really, try giving Charlie Price of JVPrice a call he has MEWPs with built in hoses into the machine, designed just for the reason you mention, its about selecting the correct equipment.



OK Lets put some views on this

You have a cleaner on a step ladder in a public house
Ten feet from the ground
Dry dusting some areas using a mop
Should I hire in something safer, protect him should he fall
Or would that be safety gone mad

Your thoughts please

Regards  Andy


MATT BATEMAN (OWC)

  • Posts: 1821
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #32 on: July 12, 2013, 08:58:53 am »
You manage the risk, the choice is yours.

Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #33 on: July 12, 2013, 09:13:36 am »
You manage the risk, the choice is yours.

Spot on Matt  :)

trevor perry

  • Posts: 2454
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #34 on: July 12, 2013, 12:51:39 pm »
Andrew from the posts above all have said they would use water fed pole on that job instead of a MEWP, reasons being they thought it safer, cheaper and quicker than using an MEWP, on your course you highlighted all the risks involved in using a pole and how these could be removed by cordoning off a large area when pointed out this was causing a greater risk then you moved on to bringing in access equipment, from all posts above they see using a MEWP carries a larger amount of risk than the first option.
  It would be great if we could eliminate all risk on every job but that is not the case and we just have to work with the best option we have got, having a legal ruling on cordoning off would not solve this issue.
  in the next few week I am carrying a job out at night it is cleaning of a large glass canopy we have done for many years uptil about 3 years ago it was always cleaned by water fed pole from a flat roof at base of canopy, suddenly health and safety got involved and we now have to use 20m MEWP as they decided flat roof access was no longer acceptable, before the job was a doddle now you are getting tangled in harness and pole hose, using the pole at extremely uncomfortable angles whilst trying to lean over to clean glass below you, what could of been done by two men in a couple of hours now takes two men all night an extra £400 in hire charges plus you have had to lift and manoeuvre at what I feel unacceptable angles for large amount of time. My opinion the first option was always safer but because flat roof access has now become a no go on many commercial buildings they have now made this job more dangerous, having a legal ruling on an issue often does away with any common sense and often rules out what would be the best approach.
  I highlighted the job above as I know from your course you feel flat roof access in unacceptable and many of your points where valid ie how do we know for sure the surface we are going to stand on can take our weight and how can this possibly be assessed accurately, I totally agree but sometimes it is still the best option

Not really, try giving Charlie Price of JVPrice a call he has MEWPs with built in hoses into the machine, designed just for the reason you mention, its about selecting the correct equipment.


 Even with built in hoses this does not remove the awkward working angle for long periods with poles, I am a pretty strong guy and believe me even after positioning MEWP in best position it is still very awkward and difficult.
better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove any doubt

trevor perry

  • Posts: 2454
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #35 on: July 12, 2013, 01:02:21 pm »
Andrew from the posts above all have said they would use water fed pole on that job instead of a MEWP, reasons being they thought it safer, cheaper and quicker than using an MEWP, on your course you highlighted all the risks involved in using a pole and how these could be removed by cordoning off a large area when pointed out this was causing a greater risk then you moved on to bringing in access equipment, from all posts above they see using a MEWP carries a larger amount of risk than the first option.
  It would be great if we could eliminate all risk on every job but that is not the case and we just have to work with the best option we have got, having a legal ruling on cordoning off would not solve this issue.
  in the next few week I am carrying a job out at night it is cleaning of a large glass canopy we have done for many years uptil about 3 years ago it was always cleaned by water fed pole from a flat roof at base of canopy, suddenly health and safety got involved and we now have to use 20m MEWP as they decided flat roof access was no longer acceptable, before the job was a doddle now you are getting tangled in harness and pole hose, using the pole at extremely uncomfortable angles whilst trying to lean over to clean glass below you, what could of been done by two men in a couple of hours now takes two men all night an extra £400 in hire charges plus you have had to lift and manoeuvre at what I feel unacceptable angles for large amount of time. My opinion the first option was always safer but because flat roof access has now become a no go on many commercial buildings they have now made this job more dangerous, having a legal ruling on an issue often does away with any common sense and often rules out what would be the best approach.
  I highlighted the job above as I know from your course you feel flat roof access in unacceptable and many of your points where valid ie how do we know for sure the surface we are going to stand on can take our weight and how can this possibly be assessed accurately, I totally agree but sometimes it is still the best option

Not really, try giving Charlie Price of JVPrice a call he has MEWPs with built in hoses into the machine, designed just for the reason you mention, its about selecting the correct equipment.



OK Lets put some views on this

You have a cleaner on a step ladder in a public house
Ten feet from the ground
Dry dusting some areas using a mop
Should I hire in something safer, protect him should he fall
Or would that be safety gone mad

Your thoughts please

Regards  Andy



 This again was an item on your course and if I remember right the cleaner died and brewery got a very large fine. Ideally better equipment could of been used ie podium steps with built in guard rails or clean with extension poles, but just like any other piece of equipment if a step ladder was used correctly by not using top 3 steps to stand on always maintain 3 points of contact, not overstretching and it being positioned on firm level ground then a step ladder would be sufficient for the job.
  Are we not going a little of subject here though after hearing many experienced window cleaners views on the pictures that where posted would you not agree WFP was the safer option, may be sunshine cleaning can put the pictures on the health and safety forum he goes on I would be really interested for him to post back their views on the matter.
better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove any doubt

Moderator David@stives

  • Posts: 8829
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #36 on: July 12, 2013, 01:11:14 pm »
Hi Andy

A public House owner got prosecuted for sending an untrained member of staff up a stepladder, I think he fell, it was in  Cornwall I think

Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #37 on: July 12, 2013, 01:23:39 pm »
I have put several scenarios to the H&S forum and there response was far stricter than Andrews. You and others have demonstrated that you are not interested in the H&S forums opinion it appears because they don't agree with your view. Their qualifications are doubted and pespective questioned.

As for my picture on here you can criticise all you like.

The difference between a wise man and a foolish man is that the wise man will listen to the arguments of his enemy while the foolish man will not even listen to the advice of a friend.

trevor perry

  • Posts: 2454
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #38 on: July 12, 2013, 01:35:29 pm »
I have put several scenarios to the H&S forum and there response was far stricter than Andrews. You and others have demonstrated that you are not interested in the H&S forums opinion it appears because they don't agree with your view. Their qualifications are doubted and pespective questioned.

As for my picture on here you can criticise all you like.

The difference between a wise man and a foolish man is that the wise man will listen to the arguments of his enemy while the foolish man will not even listen to the advice of a friend.

 I hope the above was not directed at me as it was me that suggested you post it on the H and S forum for me to see their views , and now because you don't accept views of posts on here you post a saying that implies we are all foolish and viewed as your enemy, I can understand you being a little upset as some of the comments have been personal towards yourself but please try and ignore those and stick to the issue the thread was set up for.
better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove any doubt

windiewasher

  • Posts: 4393
Re: Photo taken during H&S Audit
« Reply #39 on: July 12, 2013, 01:41:39 pm »
I have put several scenarios to the H&S forum and there response was far stricter than Andrews. You and others have demonstrated that you are not interested in the H&S forums opinion it appears because they don't agree with your view. Their qualifications are doubted and pespective questioned.

As for my picture on here you can criticise all you like.

The difference between a wise man and a foolish man is that the wise man will listen to the arguments of his enemy while the foolish man will not even listen to the advice of a friend.
You and your sidekick arent friends,you are enemys of every window cleaner.
Glad i never wasted my money joining fwc thats all i can say.
 As for your mat that is far more dangerous than all your scenario pics.infact the only dangerous was the way your van was parked the otherday on a corner.
 
Takings off all first cleans till march 7th 2014
October  total=  cleaned  extra per month
November = cleaned extra per month
Total £  so far.