[heritagecleaning]

Sound advice - think I'll watermark it

[John Kelly]

Great idea but would be even more powerfull if the pro photo was a minger and showing the contrast on the wand stroke.

[John Kelly]

There is a contrast but some stains around would be more convincing, does look a little photoshopped.

[heritagecleaning]

Well I thought it was alright.

[derek west]

love it, that will work well, the public won't scrutanize it like we will, go with it and send me a copy and i'll buy you a pint next time i see you.   

[Simon Gerrard]

Trouble is they are two different carpets which spoils the effect.

Simon

[John Kelly]

It looks good just nit picking.

[Neil Jones]

Watermark it

[Kev Loomes]

It's a shame that the RD is apparently cleaning almost as well as the pro wand.

Some customers may think that apart from the width of the cleaning path, there isn't a massive difference. And if they haven't got some blue marks etc, then will get a similar result - and will think 'I'll be happy with that tbh' and thus go and hire a RD....saving money.

The RD needs to show hardly any difference, splashes everywhere and generally a bit of a mess - and a dull/gloomy shot like they do for other adverts.

Only saying!

[dan paton]

I think it looks too professional mate . it would look more real if as simon says it was on the same carpet and the shots were not so perfect . the pro one looks like its been through photoshop .. sorry just my opinion