going 35mph in a 30 is illegal,but im sure plenty of the do gooders on here have done so. dont have double standards unless you have never done anything illegal. anyone that says different is a liar
That's an interesting moral argument Luther, how do you feel about the scale of behaviour?
Is going a touch over the speed limit equal to a £1000 bribe?
Is doing 35 in a 30 zone equal to violent crime? Do I have double standards if condemn one and not the other? Do I have double standards if I do the lesser but condemn the greater?
If I'm happy to break the speed limit by 5mph are my morals shot to pieces?
Generally in life punishment for wrong is comensurate with the wrongdoing which indicates a scale of gravity of wrongdoing.
Can a person not have an opinion unless they are faultless?
The argument you state above is weak and generally, although probably not in this case, made when the person in the wrong wants to deflect attention from their actions.
If I go over the speed limit I must accept the consequences which in all likelyhood will be at most 3 points. It may or may not affect my life.
If I get caught accepting or offering a bribe and it goes public my reputation as a business will be forever damaged. It may or may not affect my life but it will affect my reputation. The question of morality comes in when my actions affect
other people, an honest business loosing out to backhanders for example, or a company paying over the odds as the process of bidding has been corrupted.
This is an interesting debate and in my opinion filters out the honest from the perfidious.