Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Stephen Fox

  • Posts: 471
Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« on: November 04, 2012, 10:02:11 am »
Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle

First of all I would like to thank everyone who has commented on the Facelift threads over the last few weeks, both positive and negative, . It has been invaluable and the feedback truly appreciated. What an eye opener! The Phoenix range is the first product from the 'new' Facelift since we bought them last year, the learning curve has been tremendous!

To move Facelift into the modern world of window cleaning we needed a better pole. So we started with, what is in our mind, the current leader - Gardiners and aimed to make a product, if possible, that was better. Personally I believe unless you can produce something of value, why bother? No one needs a second rate knock off, if we can't come out with what we believe is a better product, we may as well close shop.

Seeing as Alex has years of pole building and selling experience, along with a great reputation, we have used his range as our current template therefore taking what Gardiners deems 'correct' we have adopted.

Pole Lengths
This is where the lengths come in. Basically whatever extended pole lengths Alex uses we, I hate to say it, have copied and labeled as our equivalent version. We have the pretty much exact same tube sizes. So for example, If Alex says an 18, 22, etc is his stated specs then we have to assume the same and that this is the accepted norm.

Now, we never wanted to get into a tit for tat with another supplier, but Alex has gone for an out an out attack of Facelift (which he's interestingly  never done before with other companies) going as far as releasing a video to slate the range which he has since taken down when we responded  with ours.

The acts on pole lengths: (Here are some stated extended lengths from Gardiners website)

CLX/SLX poles

CLX 10 - 3.01m - 9.10ft
CLX 14 - 4m - 13.1ft
CLX/SLX 18 - 5.22m - 17.1ft
CLX/SLX 22 - 6.39m - 20.11ft
CLX/SLX 27 - 8.10m - 26.6ft
SLX 25 - 7.62m - 25ft
SLX 30 - 9m - 29.6ft
SLX 35 - 10.34m - 33.11ft

The only one which is the full length is the SLX25. The main question we need to ask is why is this suddenly an issue, when another company emulates these pole sizes and Alex has been getting away with it for years!? In fact, i find it staggering for Alex to pull us up on an extended lengths when his fall short in nearly every version.

In our case we have a few more inches due to our pole design so we are closer to the stated pole length. When you add neck and brush you are even closer to the full length of the pole.

Bottom line - if your unhappy with our pole lengths, what can I say, this is now the norm! You been letting Alex get away with it for years!  ;D

Pole Weights
In the same way we have emulated the pole lengths we have done with the weights. There is a slight difference in that lesser weighing poles end to be less rigid, wear quicker and will be weaker when made from the same substance. We have taken this  into consideration, as long as we are in the same weight area as the competition we would, and our customers have stated, want a more rigid harder wearing pole than a marginally lighter, weaker pole.

Alex has stated we say our pole UL26 is 1300g, which is not true. We don't go into gram for gram weights, tad to petty for us. We have published it as 1.3kg approx which it is. This is a bare pole and clamps, no collar, hose, etc. This is how Gardiner state their pole weights. In fact, if you hold and SLX25 and a shorter stacked longer length UL26 the weight is almost identical to the user. Going by the criteria that Alex has weighed our UL26 I would challenge him to do the same with his pole range over his published weights, everyone of them would be heavier as he would have to add an adaptor, hose, etc. Prove me wrong.

Our Focus
With the Phoenix we have looked at the pole as a whole, we think this is far more important than focusing in one area i.e. weight, rigidity, clamps, pole tolerance,  etc. the pole needs to work completely as one tool. It's about the overall experience. In fact, this is reflected in the fibreglass version. Fibreglass poles have had a bad rep for years and considered a cheap, budget product. The standard Phoenix works very well and out performs some suppliers hybrid poles.

I could go on and on, probably will do on the new site when it's finally launched. So I'll sum it up in two points.

1) We want to make outstanding tools and products that improve the industry, we got a few lined up and can't wait to get them out there but will take valuable lessons learnt here and more forward.

2) We want to be completely transparent as a company. Companies live and die on their reputation. We aim to be the world leader in water fed pole products, innovation and reputation. We have a long way to go to catch up with Alex's good name but think we can do it. Time will tell I guess.

Thanks again for reading and appreciate the input (even from the haters! Especially you sfwc!!)

So ready for any attacks, hate mail, letter bombs, etc.

Dave Willis

Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2012, 10:11:08 am »
Well, just answer my questions please.
Is the ultralight high modulus like the Xtreme?
Is the top section for occasional use only?
When is it available?
Do you think your carbon poles are harder wearing than Gardiners, if so how have you done it?

ben M

  • Posts: 4720
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2012, 10:13:59 am »
Mr Fox, are you the big boss of facelift? Who is mike? an employee? thanks

Stephen Fox

  • Posts: 471
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2012, 10:22:19 am »
Well, just answer my questions please.
Is the ultralight high modulus like the Xtreme?
Is the top section for occasional use only?
When is it available?
Do you think your carbon poles are harder wearing than Gardiners, if so how have you done it?

Mark,

Not high mod, our carbon is very good so no real need for the extra expense.

Top section we have designed for occasional use, but can be used every minute of the day if you wish. It's the worlds shortest stacked 25ft plus pole. I would personally say if you need a 25ft plus pole for most of your working day then buy a 30ft and make your life easier.

Have a look at our vid while its still up for a little more info on the pole wear

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHTn9ft7aXY&feature=plcp

Not entirely happy with it as we have a used SLX pole to compare but it just to get the idea. Will remove and replace shortly.

Stephen Fox

  • Posts: 471
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2012, 10:27:57 am »
Mr Fox, are you the big boss of facelift? Who is mike? an employee? thanks

One of the directors. Mike is the main man at Facelift.

Lee GLS

  • Posts: 3844
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2012, 10:37:43 am »
I'm sorry but who uses the lateral clamp like the bloke in the video, he looks like a  the way he is doing it.

Stephen Fox

  • Posts: 471
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2012, 10:40:47 am »
Ok, I'll let him know that!

Any other issues to address, thoughts Lee?

Lee GLS

  • Posts: 3844
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2012, 10:40:57 am »
So if the top section is for occasional use, then extending to sections is going to add an awful lot of weight to the end of the pole if the top sections isn't extended fully on its own?

windowcleaninginessex.co.uk

  • Posts: 716
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2012, 10:45:42 am »
I'm sorry but who uses the lateral clamp like the bloke in the video, he looks like a  the way he is doing it.

That nots nice Lee, if anyone has a handicap child, they won't be happy with that comment
---THE BEST YOU CAN GET---
www.windowcleaninginessex.co.uk

ben M

  • Posts: 4720
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2012, 10:48:57 am »
I'm sorry but who uses the lateral clamp like the bloke in the video, he looks like a spastic the way he is doing it.
very bad comment Lee!

Stephen Fox

  • Posts: 471
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2012, 10:49:26 am »
So if the top section is for occasional use, then extending to sections is going to add an awful lot of weight to the end of the pole if the top sections isn't extended fully on its own?

No not at all. The section is very lite and pretty much unnoticeable, it weighs a little more than a 25SLX but is a lot shorter, easier to use. It's a pretty new concept hence the confusion at first.

Lee GLS

  • Posts: 3844
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2012, 10:50:27 am »
I'm sorry but who uses the lateral clamp like the bloke in the video, he looks like a spastic the way he is doing it.

That nots nice Lee, if anyone has a handicap child, they won't be happy with that comment

Boo hoo, my point was, he way comparing the speed of the clamps, but the way the guy was operating the lateral clamps is not how they are used in normal practice, he is obviously trying to make the Phoenix clamp look faster by having someone operate the lateral clamp like a .

Lee GLS

  • Posts: 3844
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2012, 10:51:04 am »
I'm sorry but who uses the lateral clamp like the bloke in the video, he looks like a spastic the way he is doing it.
very bad comment Lee!

Why is it a bad comment?

That is what it looks like

windowcleaninginessex.co.uk

  • Posts: 716
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2012, 10:56:42 am »
Not nice Lee, have a little think, choose your words more carefully
---THE BEST YOU CAN GET---
www.windowcleaninginessex.co.uk

Lee GLS

  • Posts: 3844
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #14 on: November 04, 2012, 10:59:54 am »
Not nice Lee, have a little think, choose your words more carefully

Spastic is not a nasty word, has it been blocked on here? No it has not, so i am free to use it, that was the best way to describe it. people are so easily offended these days because of PC.

G Griffin

  • Posts: 40745
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #15 on: November 04, 2012, 11:09:56 am »
Not nice Lee, have a little think, choose your words more carefully

Spastic is not a nasty word, has it been blocked on here? No it has not, so i am free to use it, that was the best way to describe it. people are so easily offended these days because of PC.

We, ourselves, are not always the best to judge what is and isn't offensive. The word isn't really used, these days, perhaps because of the context it was used in.
I'm sure you didn't mean it in an offensive way but the word was used in a derogatory manner, so it became out-dated and inappropriate.  
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

James Leet

  • Posts: 273
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #16 on: November 04, 2012, 11:43:12 am »
Stephen Fox, Have we not came across that name before ?


You seem very small minded harping on about ' Alex did this & Alex called us that ' , grow up, this isnt a school playground.




♠Winp®oClean♠

  • Posts: 4085
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #17 on: November 04, 2012, 12:39:46 pm »
Stephen Fox, Have we not came across that name before ?


You seem very small minded harping on about ' Alex did this & Alex called us that ' , grow up, this isnt a school playground.





Stephen fox used to post as Foxman. He was quite arrogant to be honest! His knowledge of products isn't that great either, on answering 3 questions about a brush he sells he got ALL 3 wrong!  ;D

Stephen Fox

  • Posts: 471
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #18 on: November 04, 2012, 12:45:32 pm »
Stephen Fox, Have we not came across that name before ?


You seem very small minded harping on about ' Alex did this & Alex called us that ' , grow up, this isnt a school playground.


James, sorry it comes across like this, this is exactly what we didn't want....but Alex did start it ;D

There is a little history behind it, with a video, etc, etc

But your right, is just like a playground and I'll be the first to admit (and any one who knows me) that I'm still a kid and have yet to grow up.

Stephen Fox

  • Posts: 471
Re: Gardiner/Facelift pole length and weight debacle
« Reply #19 on: November 04, 2012, 12:51:23 pm »
Stephen Fox, Have we not came across that name before ?


You seem very small minded harping on about ' Alex did this & Alex called us that ' , grow up, this isnt a school playground.





Stephen fox used to post as Foxman. He was quite arrogant to be honest! His knowledge of products isn't that great either, on answering 3 questions about a brush he sells he got ALL 3 wrong!  ;D

That must of been a few years back... Can I plead immaturity??