Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Colin Day

Re: TM v portable
« Reply #180 on: December 31, 2011, 11:25:25 am »
why oh why does everybody think a tm costs a fortune to buy and run . 

The one I want (Brand New with 2 years warranty) is £17k....

I think £17k's  a fortune and not to be parted with, willy nilly.... ;D

Richard Basey-Fisher

  • Posts: 260
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #181 on: December 31, 2011, 11:31:28 am »
why oh why does everybody think a tm costs a fortune to buy and run . 

The one I want (Brand New with 2 years warranty) is £17k....

I think £17k's  a fortune and not to be parted with, willy nilly.... ;D

yes buts thats new colin

Colin Day

Re: TM v portable
« Reply #182 on: December 31, 2011, 11:57:43 am »
I wouldn't want second a hand TM though, there's always an element of risk taking of someone else's problems on. I CBA'd with that....

And I'll want a dual operator machine as I'll probably take someone on, but it's early days yet.... ;)

jasonl

  • Posts: 3183
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #183 on: December 31, 2011, 12:12:07 pm »
A decent tm with the hoses , van all setup vat etc is 20k   over 4 years until it is worth 2 k, this   means that with financing costs it is £100 a week every week , which means £300 a week in EXTRA  turnover would be needed to stay the same for me .

For others this would be different.


Top of the range porty set up would be 5 k , worth 1k after 4 years

Top of the range rotary system 2k , worth 500 after 4 years. 


After 20 years , 3 marriages 2 houses bought , paid for and given away , 3 kids brought up , dozens of foreign holidays , flash cars and a nice lifestyle , ill stick with the rotary for now.

 Once the shop is built and paid for and if I had another windfall  then I would get another TM , but would not rely on it for the bulk of my income.
I clean carpets
I dry Buildings

Mike Halliday

  • Posts: 11581
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #184 on: December 31, 2011, 12:30:11 pm »
[quote a ;) ;)uthor=jasonl link=topic=143393.msg1187533#msg1187533 date=1325333527]
A decent tm with the hoses , van all setup vat etc is 20k   over 4 years until it is worth 2 k,   [/quote]

if anyone has a £20k T/M thats 4 years old and they will sell it for £2k please call me straight away!!!!!

or perhaps Jasons figure are just waffle to help sell the point he is trying to make
Mike Halliday.  www.henryhalliday.co.uk

jasonl

  • Posts: 3183
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #185 on: December 31, 2011, 02:15:30 pm »
OK £8k AFTER 4 YEARS , I dont think everyone realises depreciation is one of the biggest costs in TM ownership .

Yes they are good machines , but for profit , LM all the way.
I clean carpets
I dry Buildings

Mike Halliday

  • Posts: 11581
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #186 on: December 31, 2011, 03:25:50 pm »
any figures can be manipulated to make a point.

 if i offered everyone who wants one a truck mount and thery only need to pay me a £1.50p for every hour they use it who would say no? because a £10k truckmount  will last 7.5k hours so the initial investment in a T/M is only £1.50p an hour.

 of course this is waffle but to is just as applicable to mention the lifetime cost of buying a truckmount as it is to  bring   depreciation into the discussion
Mike Halliday.  www.henryhalliday.co.uk

Tony Gill Carpet Smart

  • Posts: 1254
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #187 on: December 31, 2011, 04:10:29 pm »
Colin 2nd Hand for me every time It's only like buying a car.
Jason are you on another planet don't know where you get your figures from.

Cheers Tony
STAY YOUNG HAVE FUN BE HAPPY xx
www.carpetcleanersbridlington.co.uk

Jim_77

Re: TM v portable
« Reply #188 on: December 31, 2011, 04:57:45 pm »
Plant/machinery depreciation is commonly written down at 25% per annum

On that basis, over 4 years, £20k would depreciate to £6,328.13 :)

Doug Holloway

  • Posts: 3917
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #189 on: December 31, 2011, 05:01:06 pm »
Hi guys

TM's do cost a lot more to buy and run but they make you a lot more money.

It all depends on where you want to be in the market.

LM can be a fantastic earner, the only times I have done four figures in a day has been LM. Unfortunately it's not as good on domestic and a lot more messing around.

Happy new year

Doug

wynne jones

  • Posts: 2918
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #190 on: December 31, 2011, 05:38:34 pm »
OK £8k AFTER 4 YEARS , I dont think everyone realises depreciation is one of the biggest costs in TM ownership .

Yes they are good machines , but for profit , LM all the way.

I think everyone has a different idea about money being well spent.

For instance Jason didn't you buy a new Range Rover (which I doubt created ANY income for you) only to lose tens of thousands on it when you sold it? You obviously thought it was worth it to you. You could have bought a Skoda, it would do the same job and cost the same as you lost in depreciation on your Chelsea tractor. 
It's not expensive, you just can't afford it.

Re: TM v portable
« Reply #191 on: December 31, 2011, 06:54:05 pm »
I wouldn't want second a hand TM though, there's always an element of risk taking of someone else's problems on. I CBA'd with that....

If anyones got or knows of  a 2nd hand TM for sale then I'd be interested, afterall 16 years as a mechanic has it's plus points with machinery.

Colin Day

Re: TM v portable
« Reply #192 on: December 31, 2011, 07:11:40 pm »
Colin 2nd Hand for me every time It's only like buying a car.
Jason are you on another planet don't know where you get your figures from.

Cheers Tony


I know what you're saying, but I wouldn't trust a TMer not to sell me a lemon.... ;D ;D ;D

jasonl

  • Posts: 3183
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #193 on: December 31, 2011, 08:37:08 pm »
OK £8k AFTER 4 YEARS , I dont think everyone realises depreciation is one of the biggest costs in TM ownership .

Yes they are good machines , but for profit , LM all the way.

I think everyone has a different idea about money being well spent.

For instance Jason didn't you buy a new Range Rover (which I doubt created ANY income for you) only to lose tens of thousands on it when you sold it? You obviously thought it was worth it to you. You could have bought a Skoda, it would do the same job and cost the same as you lost in depreciation on your Chelsea tractor. 

Funny you should say that , as I now drive a 15k Skoda Yeti !
I clean carpets
I dry Buildings

derek west

Re: TM v portable
« Reply #194 on: December 31, 2011, 09:07:21 pm »
OK £8k AFTER 4 YEARS , I dont think everyone realises depreciation is one of the biggest costs in TM ownership .

Yes they are good machines , but for profit , LM all the way.

I think everyone has a different idea about money being well spent.

For instance Jason didn't you buy a new Range Rover (which I doubt created ANY income for you) only to lose tens of thousands on it when you sold it? You obviously thought it was worth it to you. You could have bought a Skoda, it would do the same job and cost the same as you lost in depreciation on your Chelsea tractor. 

Funny you should say that , as I now drive a 15k Skoda Yeti !
15k eh! thats quite high mileage for a skoda,  ;D

wynne jones

  • Posts: 2918
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #195 on: January 01, 2012, 10:58:40 am »
Never thought I'd say this but I think Skoda make cracking cars. The shape of the Yeti probably makes it ideal as a back up vehicle if you needed to.

Happy New Year.
It's not expensive, you just can't afford it.

jasonl

  • Posts: 3183
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #196 on: January 01, 2012, 11:57:53 am »
It  is nowhere near as good as the RR sport , but the build quality is up to the VW Audi group standard .

I would rather have a decent car than a TM though .
I clean carpets
I dry Buildings

graeme marchbank

  • Posts: 28
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #197 on: January 01, 2012, 01:37:32 pm »
TM one pass clean, simples ;D

My system cost new (everything including van) £40k

Bought second hand after 4 years with 1,200hrs for £15K

Still running perfectly after 8 years of service (2200hrs) and could sell easily for £5k

Some will say, It hardly gets used.... this is true, as a typical day due to it's top notch efficiency, it only run's for an hour or two, doing 2 or 3 jobs a day and uses £3 something per hour on diesel.

I also have to use LM, Porty ect...but my TM pulls rank on these methods every-time!!

I agree with Jim and Mike and I too have trouble understanding Ian's posts, surely the name of the game is to say," yes I can do that for you" (the customer) and charge enough to make a good profit out of each job regardless of how you do it.


Graeme
Keep on trucking.........

Shaun_Ashmore

  • Posts: 11382
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #198 on: January 01, 2012, 03:22:32 pm »
Quote
I would rather have a decent car than a TM though . 
 
 
 
;D

Shaun

PS does that Skoda have a big footprint?


Paul Heath

  • Posts: 600
Re: TM v portable
« Reply #199 on: January 01, 2012, 03:54:36 pm »
"I would rather have a decent car than a TM though"
I would like to see a skoda clean a lounge carpet as good as a TM.. ;D