Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

Tony Stewart

  • Posts: 320
My Poor Results
« on: October 25, 2011, 06:28:04 pm »
I cleaned a downstairs room and a bedroom today. The bedroom carpet was a wool mix and 20 years old. He had just had it refitted from an old house and wanted a clean after he had decorated the bedroom. This was the result after I had cleaned it with the Extraction Pro...........awful. You can see the traffic area round the bed.
I vacuumed well, sprayed with traffic clean and left a 10 minute dwell time. Used Extraction pro and HWE as per Prochem's manual. I just could not get the darned thing clean. The traffic areas were still looking dirty. Customer was OK about it as he said it was much better than it was. However I had cleaned it then went over it again with Stain Pro and a stiff hand brush and extracted with FF Rinse on the blacker areas. I did not want to do any more as I don't want to over wet the carpet. I need to call the customer just for my own personal pride of standards and re-clean it if necessary after it has dried but thought you guys may have a better idea of what went wrong. The tank was filthy so I know muck has come out! What was worse he gave me a tip.
Starts at the bottom likes it and stays there

markpowell

  • Posts: 2279
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2011, 06:33:12 pm »
Try Powerburst pre-spray, make sure you agitate well and rinse.
Did you agitate the traffic areas?
Looking at the pic it looks like uv damage and a badly worn carpet. You would never ever bring that up like new, your expectations may be too high mate
Mark

Gary Humphreys

  • Posts: 92
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2011, 06:35:55 pm »
have you got a before because it doesnt look too bad to me. Not all carpets will come up to your satisfaction you know - wear etc.

Gary Humphreys

  • Posts: 92
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2011, 06:37:37 pm »
Just reread your post and you got a tip Lol.
Not that bad a job then?

markpowell

  • Posts: 2279
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2011, 06:37:42 pm »
Would have looked 100% better if you had reset the pile too.
Have you attended a training course yet ?
MArk

markpowell

  • Posts: 2279
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2011, 06:39:21 pm »
Would have looked 100% better if you had reset the pile too.
Have you attended a training course yet? Im surprised you went over again with stain pro as it is a protein spotter you would have been better with ultrapac renovate
Mark

Craigp

  • Posts: 1272
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2011, 06:41:05 pm »
Tony don't worry too much, this is what's called in the trade- a sh*t carpet, often cheap crap are found in bedrooms. You can't polish a turd! ;D

Looks like nylon.

derek west

Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2011, 06:47:11 pm »
did you run a bonnet over it to see if it was slipper or sock dye transfer, water won't get that out but a bonnet will improve it. providing you get transfer on the pad.

Tony Stewart

  • Posts: 320
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2011, 06:58:10 pm »
Thanks guys.
I have powerburst in my kit but it just did not seem to be a grease problem to me.
Did agitate the traffic areas as per usual
Yes been on the Prochem course and the Cleansmart course but you guys are a better course after that!
Bonnetting would be my next option I suppose. I could be sock dye transfer I suppose..........I had that before on a white carpet and if you looked up real close you could see little stands of fibre also wich gives it a clue. I was up close and personal with the hand tool to give it an extra go the second time.
It may be just that the carpet did not live up to my expectations. As I say he gave me £5.00 as a tip anyway!
Starts at the bottom likes it and stays there

Len Gribble

  • Posts: 5106
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2011, 07:45:47 pm »
Tony

It appears you spent a lot of time on it good for you, ??? but your profit took a hit! :'(

I only have Power burst in my kit as a pre-spray, running ff rinse wasteful it’s synthetic, fresh water rinse would be OK as it would for 80/20 (do I need a tin hat ;))

Len
Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other. (Sidcup Kent)

Tony Stewart

  • Posts: 320
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2011, 08:28:58 pm »
Thanks Len, Yes I suppose profit did but when you are learning your craft I feel it's better to get it right. The cleaning courses are fine but it practice that makes you a bit better. Took 1 hour and 15 mins
Starts at the bottom likes it and stays there

craignozza

Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2011, 08:30:39 pm »
The main thing is the custy was happy ..thats what were all aiming for isnt it  :)

peter maybury

  • Posts: 916
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2011, 09:10:48 pm »
Prochem training is good but they obviously promote theirown products and not what supplier can give you across the board top chemicals so would suggest the ncca as an alternative trainer. What is the cleansmart training not heard of that before?
Peter

Tony Stewart

  • Posts: 320
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2011, 09:18:36 pm »
Peter
Cleansmart Nottingham run a carpet and upholstery course run by Derek Bolton (top guy!!)

http://www.cleansmartsupplies.co.uk/acatalog/Carpet-cleaning-training-course.html
Starts at the bottom likes it and stays there

Jim_77

Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2011, 10:13:19 pm »
Hi Tony,  some constructive criticism, not meant to offend but to offer advice :)

Are you sure it's 80/20?  Although the photo is blurred, there appears to be quite a coarse texture to the pile in the traffic areas which is an indication of polyprop, partly matted down and therefore losing the original definition of texture.  Blah blah, waffle, not very important anyway.....

One thing I'm very curious about... is that a really tiny room with a tiny wardrobe, or is your wand like, 2 foot wide ???  Or is it a walk-behind machine?

I think there may be two areas letting you down here:

1) Chemistry.  Although prochem do a certain number of products which are very good, you'll find some far superior products from other suppliers. Powerburst is still arguably the "daddy" on a wide range of extreme soiling cases, doesn't have to be just greasy.  I would have added an oxidiser in to my pre-spray too on this one.

2) Agitation.  Maybe if you'd have had some form of mechanical agitation on this, with a more effective pre-spray, it would have turned out a lot different?

Also, if you are using a walk-behind type machine you'd undoubtedly get more consistently better results with a more powerful extraction unit in these situations :)

P.S. This Xmas, ask Santa for a phone with a decent camera :D

from edge2edge

  • Posts: 1507
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2011, 07:50:01 am »
Morning Tony I think the Cant polish a turd staement sums this situation up perfectly,,,,,,,,,,,,Alan

Tony Stewart

  • Posts: 320
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #16 on: October 26, 2011, 08:12:30 am »
Hi Jim,
Think you may be right. Did a flame test but probably misread the results.............should have put it in water too to test if it floated (no pun intended as to the next post!)
As to the machine its a Prochem Steempro Powerplus which I would have thought would be enough. I know you perhaps have a truck-mount which would have been better. I also think that just filling it with hot water from the customers tap meant it was not hot enough to do the job as in this case it probably needed a bit more umph!Wand is standard 2 foot.
I agitated with a brush and being a strong guy felt the brush had done the job. I could have used my rotary but feel sometimes to take that in too just to agitate the carpet seemed in the past a bit of overkill. I know people swear by the sebo for agitation I was put off by some guys saying they spent more time cleaning the blessed rollers.
The only problem I have Jim is that whereas I can use the phrase a bad workman always blames his tools.......the camera is an Iphone 4 so I am blaming the photo tool!!!
But thanks ever so much for the advice I think you are probably spot on (no other pun intended!!!)
Starts at the bottom likes it and stays there

Doug Holloway

  • Posts: 3917
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #17 on: October 26, 2011, 08:20:31 am »
Hi Guys

Tony, I wouldn't bother too much with acid rinsing on this type of carpet, go for a higher pH.

Cheers

Doug

robert meldrum

  • Posts: 1984
Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #18 on: October 26, 2011, 08:49:30 am »
TWO FOOT WAND ??

clinton

Re: My Poor Results
« Reply #19 on: October 26, 2011, 09:01:50 am »
He gave you a tip so must be happy with what work you did on it mate.