This is an advertisementInterested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
You save a wee bit on resin but not much. Once the resin starts to go off, then after a few hundred litres it is well guffed and actually makes no difference to the water going into the second vessel, you might as well put it in through one as the resin is so ineffective in the first one. It is better than only one vessel but as I said, the saving is very little over all.Added later, this is for DI only use and not RO, where the saving would be a bit better.
I am going to agree with both of you to an extent, if you have low tds from tap then the saving will be minimal I think, if your tap is high tds it probably would save a bit more as it will take a longer to get the duff resin up to that reading.hope that makes sense
Quote from: Stu Mac on May 24, 2011, 10:52:43 pmI am going to agree with both of you to an extent, if you have low tds from tap then the saving will be minimal I think, if your tap is high tds it probably would save a bit more as it will take a longer to get the duff resin up to that reading.hope that makes senseMy tap TDS is 70ppm & the old resin NEVER gets to that before the newer one needs changing.
Quote from: ♠Winp®oClean♠ on May 24, 2011, 10:54:08 pmQuote from: Stu Mac on May 24, 2011, 10:52:43 pmI am going to agree with both of you to an extent, if you have low tds from tap then the saving will be minimal I think, if your tap is high tds it probably would save a bit more as it will take a longer to get the duff resin up to that reading.hope that makes senseMy tap TDS is 70ppm & the old resin NEVER gets to that before the newer one needs changing. that is what I am saying where as ronnie's ppm might be 35 so the saving would be minimal as once the resin goes it tends to go fast
yes but ronnie doesn't use RO, the tap water in some places is that low anyway, but I will agree for the original post, twin di makes sense in my mindI also know how to regenerate resin to save further money, but I have never put in to practice