ok, here is the original, blowed if I am going to type out the Mail's version
Copied and pasted
Having just read the letter by Ian Douglas I feel I have to make a few points a little clearer; Firstly on Craig Mawlam, Craig also runs courses on all aspects of window cleaning, from promotion to cleaning techniques for traditional window cleaning as well as Water Fed Pole cleaning. These courses cover all aspects of window cleaning, including the safe and correct use of ladders.
He does indeed have a vested interest in a company that manufactures WFP (Water-fed Pole) systems, but he also works tirelessly in all aspects of the window cleaning industry.
A point must be made in that window cleaning with Water-fed Pole cleans windows to as high a standard as could ever be achieved with traditional methods, often the overall finish is in fact superior.
Indeed, to claim that the domestic customer needs to be educated that windows cleaned with a Water-fed Pole result in a lower standard clean is a grave misrepresentation.
As with any window cleaning method there is a skill involved in the use of WFP, poor standards are down to the operator and not the tools being used
Also; any window that can be reached with a ladder can most certainly be reached with a Water-fed Pole.
Water-fed Pole systems will never take over from traditional methods of window cleaning, it is just another tool for the professional window cleaner to use, but use of ladders is going to be marginalized more and more as time passes.
I am also a professional window cleaner of 21 years experience and use both traditional and Water-fed Pole. But I rarely climb a ladder anymore. There is simply little need to do so.
I help moderate one of the busiest window cleaning forums on the internet (
www.cleanitup.co.uk) and there are many thousands of window cleaners that use this forum, a large percentage of them have Water-fed Poles, very few of them go back to using ladders full time, and most find that their personal standards of work have either been maintained or improved upon.
For those that read the printed version, it ain't that different, them did himprove me grammur tho
Ian