Hi Philip
Very interesting. You make some really valid points. I suppose sometimes to have a vested interest can be a good thing.
Still, the bird poo point remains but I do think that the public will eventually have to accept that somethings will have to be.
In the end, I think that ladders will be a thing of the past as far as professional people are concerned.
The only tinge of doubt I have is that there are as yet, no real facts regarding injuries from using WFP.
Someone I know near where I live seriously tore a muscle in his back and won't work again. He done that injury using WFP and as is the case with the self employed, injuries and their recording is dependant on what is said at the hospital.
A sudden gust of wind blew the pole sideways and to try and stop it potentially going through or hitting a glass roof over a cafe he done his back in.
He is now 40 years old and has been told that by the time he is 60, that injury will be disabling and that in turn could, just could, affect his life expectancy due to the mechanical action of having to breathe to excercise the lungs.
The point I am making is that with WFP there could be hidden facts that as yet are not apparent because it is so new and to quote simply how many fall from ladders and those statistics could be misleading.
At least my friend didn't die.
Also, could more deaths be prevented by falls from ladders by a more serious approach and by viewing it simply not as just 'going up a ladder to clean afew windows' but rather as something that requires thought at all times.
I am a quailified absailing instructor and imagine the statistics if I had a slack approach?
When rock climbing, absailing down is veiwed as the last resort from a safety angle yet people now absail for fun and charity.
Also, an intersting statistic is that most deaths occur under (I think - I don't have the bit of paper in front of me) 2 metres. If not then it's 3 metres. One of the 2 but anyway, a H & S study (and I can provide the paper on it) stated that most feel safe at relivately low hieghts and so were less carefull.
Is there that danger with WFP that most think they cannot fall so they become slack in how they use their bodies and suffer injuries as a result so as you end up with more serious and less serious injuries but less deaths? The reason I write that is the using of WFP is not condusive to healthy posture while working and of that, there is no doubt just as in supermarkets the checkout people and how they work is a time bomb in terms of RSI.
I can't escape the fact that there can only be less deaths from WFP and that cannot be disputed.
Hi Poleman
There was a meeting between the H&SE & Fed, which is well know by many window cleaners, it seems you did not know.
Andy
What was said? Thanks.
Cheers