Quote from: The Shiner on December 24, 2008, 07:41:45 pmQuote from: Alex Gardiner on December 24, 2008, 07:35:37 pmQuote from: Ambient Services on December 24, 2008, 06:58:33 pmQuote from: The Shiner on December 24, 2008, 03:57:54 pmWhen their was a comparison made in the BWCA mag, carbon modular poles were specifically excluded from the testing. Can't recall the reason given. No they weren't.Some carbon modular poles were excluded (such as the Super-LiteŽ2 which had recently been introduced) - The paragraph in the Autumn 2007 Issue 10 PWC Magazine said that "We did not test (these) poles....... as they are simply not robust enough for the job of window cleaning, regardless of what some suppliers claim."The Unger CarbonTec pole was included in the test, but window cleaners that liked such modular poles were dismissed as "fanboys".OK Alex. I wasn't correct then as the Unger pole was included. I do recall that there was some type of exclusion but not the exact wording. Thanks for clarifying. I was just checking through the back issues and typically, probably the only one that is missing is the one with the pole test in it. Such is life.what you keep them you will be on ironics christmas list next year
Quote from: Alex Gardiner on December 24, 2008, 07:35:37 pmQuote from: Ambient Services on December 24, 2008, 06:58:33 pmQuote from: The Shiner on December 24, 2008, 03:57:54 pmWhen their was a comparison made in the BWCA mag, carbon modular poles were specifically excluded from the testing. Can't recall the reason given. No they weren't.Some carbon modular poles were excluded (such as the Super-LiteŽ2 which had recently been introduced) - The paragraph in the Autumn 2007 Issue 10 PWC Magazine said that "We did not test (these) poles....... as they are simply not robust enough for the job of window cleaning, regardless of what some suppliers claim."The Unger CarbonTec pole was included in the test, but window cleaners that liked such modular poles were dismissed as "fanboys".OK Alex. I wasn't correct then as the Unger pole was included. I do recall that there was some type of exclusion but not the exact wording. Thanks for clarifying. I was just checking through the back issues and typically, probably the only one that is missing is the one with the pole test in it. Such is life.
Quote from: Ambient Services on December 24, 2008, 06:58:33 pmQuote from: The Shiner on December 24, 2008, 03:57:54 pmWhen their was a comparison made in the BWCA mag, carbon modular poles were specifically excluded from the testing. Can't recall the reason given. No they weren't.Some carbon modular poles were excluded (such as the Super-LiteŽ2 which had recently been introduced) - The paragraph in the Autumn 2007 Issue 10 PWC Magazine said that "We did not test (these) poles....... as they are simply not robust enough for the job of window cleaning, regardless of what some suppliers claim."The Unger CarbonTec pole was included in the test, but window cleaners that liked such modular poles were dismissed as "fanboys".
Quote from: The Shiner on December 24, 2008, 03:57:54 pmWhen their was a comparison made in the BWCA mag, carbon modular poles were specifically excluded from the testing. Can't recall the reason given. No they weren't.
When their was a comparison made in the BWCA mag, carbon modular poles were specifically excluded from the testing. Can't recall the reason given.