Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

fibresafe

  • Posts: 114
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #20 on: February 21, 2015, 10:08:22 pm »
Sorry, John, thought it was the bigger Electro. Be interested to see how you get on if you try the 2 x 6.6's in series, don't know anyone who's tried that yet

fibresafe

  • Posts: 114
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #21 on: February 21, 2015, 10:13:12 pm »
I don't think Lamb recommend any of their motors be mounted in series, but Lamb 5.7 motors have been mounted in series on quite a few machines for years

Lewis Newby

  • Posts: 353
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #22 on: February 21, 2015, 10:22:24 pm »
Im guessing 2 6.6 in series would give similar lift but anothed 20-25cfms to your enforcer john?

john martin

  • Posts: 2699
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #23 on: February 21, 2015, 10:27:22 pm »

 It would probably have the same lift as the stock Enforcer , i have two 1600w electros in mine .  Ant increase in airflow might be interesting like u say .

I think they are just covering their as$ by not recommending series in general ...
This portable in the states uses the 6.6 in series , its the same body by alltec elite and others use , they have no 2" plumbling though .

http://www.excellent-supply.com/gallery.asp?catalogid=345

Carpet2Clean

  • Posts: 378
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #24 on: February 21, 2015, 10:48:02 pm »
Hi John

Chris at Alltec was building a twin 6.6 dual stack Elite a few months a go, not to sure how its going now but did have a go at the time and it had amazing suction power.


Richard

john martin

  • Posts: 2699
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #25 on: February 21, 2015, 10:59:25 pm »
Hi John

Chris at Alltec was building a twin 6.6 dual stack Elite a few months a go, not to sure how its going now but did have a go at the time and it had amazing suction power.


Richard

sound like a parallel machine , Alltec seem to favor it which is fair enough , i kinda like series now ... and  4 vacs series /parallel even more ... four 6.6 would be real nice

Carpet2Clean

  • Posts: 378
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #26 on: February 21, 2015, 11:04:10 pm »
Hi John

Yes it was in parallel

Richard

stuart_clark

  • Posts: 1879
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #27 on: February 22, 2015, 11:04:07 am »
Trouble is there is nothing new about 2x 6.6 set up machines, the Jag was the 1st then the Airflex pity he isn't producing a tripple or a quad now that would be something



Stuart

Paul Moss

  • Posts: 2296
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #28 on: February 22, 2015, 12:03:55 pm »
Altec did a quad vac machine years ago, also had a heater on board, a massive porty .

stuart_clark

  • Posts: 1879
Re: Quick vac test ...
« Reply #29 on: February 22, 2015, 04:56:20 pm »
Aye it was called the meleniam