Interested In Advertising? | Contact Us Here
Warning!

 

Welcome to Clean It Up; the UK`s largest cleaning forum with over 34,000 members

 

Please login or register to post and reply to topics.      

 

Forgot your password? Click here

mark_roberts

  • Posts: 1899
Surround Encap
« on: May 08, 2012, 08:41:21 pm »
Had a play with this today.  Diluted 3 oz per US gallon as instructed.

Theres no foam on the carpet only a 'damp' look.  Do I need to make it stronger??  Was using brushes.

Also when using white pads I assume you cut a hole in the middle to allow the solution through when using a cimex.

Thanks
Mark

gwrightson

  • Posts: 3617
Re: Surround Encap
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2012, 08:57:22 pm »

Mark,

I find leaving the pads complete  is better, the solution once absorbed into the pad seems to give a better coverage , whether this is right or wrong !!!!!!  i,m not sure , just my preference.

The foamimg ability of surround is not as good as cimex encaps own solution, but better than rotobrite, i do now add a small amount of craftex high foamimg dry shampoo, this does help , as far as i am aware this goes not affect the properties of encapsulation as i have tried the saucer test to see the chrystalisation.

Geoff
who ever said dont knock before u try ,i never tried dog crap but i know i wouldnt like  haha

garyhumphreys

  • Posts: 180
Re: Surround Encap
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2012, 08:59:30 pm »
I have just recieved some and will be giving it a go this week - how did you you find it?

davep

  • Posts: 2589
Re: Surround Encap
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2012, 09:45:55 pm »
I don't cut hole in the white pads and even though it doesn't foam up so much it still cleans well, better than the Thermadry with bonnets

I normally mix at 5oz per gallon